Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation in a girl with Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome

  • Ali Al Kaissi1, 2Email author,
  • Farid Ben Chehida3,
  • Hassan Gharbi3,
  • Maher Ben Ghachem2,
  • Franz Grill4 and
  • Klaus Klaushofer1
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders20061:15

DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-15

Received: 06 July 2006

Accepted: 16 October 2006

Published: 16 October 2006

Abstract

We report a 15-year-old girl who presented with spinal malsegmentation, associated with other skeletal anomalies. The spinal malsegmentation was subsequently discovered to be part of the spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome. In addition, a distinctive craniocervical malformation was identified, which included atlanto-axial rotatory fixation. The clinical and the radiographic findings are described, and we emphasise the importance of computerised tomography to characterize the craniocervical malformation complex. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of a child with spondylocarpotarsal synostosis associated with atlanto-axial rotatory fixation.

Background

There have been more than 20 clinical reports of the Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome, (SSS), a condition in which patients primarily present with scoliosis/kyphoscoliosis. It is characterised, by failure of normal spinal segmentation, resulting in block vertebrae and fusion of posterior elements. Carpal and/or tarsal coalition, pes planus, dental enamel hypoplasia, decreased range of motion or dislocation of the elbow, renal anomalies, and hearing loss, are additional features. Our patient presented with scoliosis, and later, with persistent torticollis. Radiographic evaluation of the cervicocranium, which is traditionally based on the anteroposterior (open-mouth) and lateral spine radiography, was not contributory. CT scans revealed atlanto-axial rotatory fixation.

Atlanto-axial rotary fixation, (AARF) has been reported in connection with Marfan syndrome. Radiographic analysis of patients with Marfan syndrome has shown that, atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation can also occur. An increased atlanto-axial translation, larger odontoid height, and basilar impression are more prevalent in the Marfan-population compared to age-matched controls [1]. Some clinical reports describe the association of Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome and cervical malformations, [2, 3]. The cause of SSS is unknown, although autosomal recessive inheritance has been suggested. We herein reported a patient with SSS, with the additional atlanto-axial rotatory fixation. To the best of our knowledge neither AARF nor the role of computerized tomography to investigate the craniocervical junction, have been reported in patients with SSS.

Case presentation

A) The proband presented with thoracic scoliosis (Cobb angle of 85 degree) and torticollis. She was the product of an uneventful gestation, with a birth weight of 2900 g, a length of 48 cm, and a head circumference occipital-frontal circumference (OFC) of 31 cm. Her mother was a 29-year-old gravida 3, abortus 0 (term to signify the maternal obstetrical history, i.e. history of three pregnancies with no history of spontaneous abortion, it has specific significance in genetically determined disorders), married to a 33-year-old first-degree relative. She had no history of serious illness, and her developmental history was almost within the normal limits, apart from a delay in walking, which commenced at the age of 2 years.

Examination at the age of 15 years revealed (fig. 1), a height of 138 cm (-3SD), a weight of 49 kg (-1SD) and a OFC of 52 cm, which was normal. The craniofacial features were, prominent eyes, hypertelorism, facial asymmetry, retrognathia, coarse and thick scalp hair, ptyrigium colli, (more marked on the right side). Ligamentous laxity, long thin limbs, short trunk, pes planus and significant cervicothoracic scoliosis were the most prominent Orthopaedic abnormalities encountered. Neurological examination showed no deficits. Hearing, vision and intelligence were normal. Her torticollis was not accompanied by pain, and it was to the left side. On attempting to turn her head to the right, she was unable to pass the midline. There was no associated spasm of the sternomastoid muscle on the opposite side of the torticollis, and there was no shortening of the sternomastoid muscles.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Phenotype.

The child underwent a series of investigations, which included, a urine screen for metabolic disorders, a complete blood count, chromosomal analysis, basic hematological tests, plasma and urinary aminoacids assays. The results of these tests were normal. The type of scoliosis in our patient is malignantly progressive early in life and steadily during growth (poor prognosis). It was therefore treated through stabilisation of the spine. This was done by a posterior in situ fusion. The fused area incorporated the entire bar and extended one mobile level above and below the bar. Clinical and radiological follow up was mandatory to further assessing the condition. On the other hand, the suggested plan for the treatment of AARF is either a transoral decompression followed by a posterior fixation or the same procedure without posterior fixation

B) The radiographic examination:

Renal and pelvic ultrasounds showed normal genito-urinary system, and her ovaries, tubes, uterus were normal.

* The Wachenheim clivus line (a method to evaluate and assess craniocervical junction abnormality/injury), a line drawn along the posterior aspect of the clivus toward the odontoid process. An abnormality is suspected when this line does not intersect and or/not tangential to the odontoid process. [4].

** Chamberlain's line joins the hard palate to the posterior lip of the foramen magnum. Basilar impression is defined as being present when the tip of the dens projects more than 5 mm above Chamberlain's line [5].

C) Discussion

Atlanto-axial subluxation is a rotational disorder of the atlanto-axial joint, that results in either limited rotation of the neck, or, in rare cases, fixation. The anterior facet of C1 becomes locked on the facet of C2, causing impaired rotation at this joint. It can occur with or without C1-C2 dislocation [6, 7].

The entity of atlanto-axial dislocation was first described by Corner [8] who reviewed 20 cases. Since then there have been a remarkable number of cases of this not uncommon and potentially catastrophic condition [911]. Chiapparini et al. [12] described atlanto-axial rotatory fixation in four pediatric cases, as a rare cause of torticollis that may occur spontaneously or in association with trauma or upper respiratory tract infection. Subluxation has also been described following retropharangeal abscess, tonsillectomy, or pharyngoplasty [13, 14]. Other forms of atlanto-axial dislocation develop following acute cervical trauma or due to slow erosion around the joints in, for example rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and tubercular arthritis [13].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

showed spinal segmentation defects and marked thoracic scoliosis (Cobb angle of 85 degree) with a unilateral unsegmented bar along the cervical and the thoracic spine, CT scan showed two unsegmented spinal bars-upper right arrow showed unsegmented unilateral cervical bar at the level of the C5-C6. Lower left arrow showed another unilateral unsegmented bar extending from T6-T10.

Fielding and Hawkins [15, 16], studied a series of seventeen cases. All patients had torticollis and a diminished range of movement. The typical head position was lateral flexion to one side, rotation toward the opposite side and slight flexion – the " cock robin" position. None of the reported cases manifested other clinical and or radiological features in favor of a syndromic association.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Hand x-ray showed synostosis between capitate-hamate-and lunate-triquetrum.

Hertzka et al., [1], described atlanto-axial rotatory dislocation in a series of three patients with Marfan syndrome. Two of his patients developed acute torticollis postoperatively, following pectus excavatum repair. The diagnosis was made in the third patient after she presented to the emergency room with a weeklong history of unresolved neck pain, following minor trauma. Hobbs et al., [17] described the diagnostic criteria in Marfan syndrome.

The vertebral defects encountered in SSS consist mainly of fusion of multiple vertebral bodies in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine (block vertebrae) together with the fusion of the posterior elements of the neural arch. Thoracic scoliosis is the most common presentation of this disorder [1823]. There are some reports with additional cervical abnormalities; Seaver et al., [3] reported a female child presented with subluxation of C2-C3. Two other patients reported by Langer et al. [21] manifested odontoid hypoplasia only. Neither AARF nor visualization of the craniocervical junction by CT scan has been reported in association with SSS.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Foot x ray showed multiple fusions, talo-calcanear, talo-navicular, naviculo-calcanear, cunieform2-cuneiform 3.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Axial CT image demonstrated AARF; the right lateral mass of the atlas C1 lies anterior to the articular surface of C2.

The cervical spine differs from the thoracic or lumbar region in both anatomy and functional respects. In particular the upper cervical spine has its own unique anatomy, including several ligaments designed to permit axial rotation of the atlas and head. Therefore the pathogenesis of cervicothoracic scoliosis should be carefully evaluated.

Based on the present study, we suggest that the mechanism of the rotatory dislocation of C1-C2 is due to the existence of two adverse factors. First, the presence of a unilateral cervical unsegmented bar. Second, the congenital ligamental laxity which possibly caused further injury to the poor ligamental fixation of the scoliotic cervical region, and specifically the atlas-axis complex. We believe that the craniocervical junction is a vulnerable and sensitive area needs detailed evaluation in patients with congenital scoliosis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Sagittal CT image reveals anterior displacement of the odontoid process (O) to the posterior aspect of the anterior arch of C1. Note the Wachenheim clivus line* (a), which is drawn along the posterior aspect of the clivus toward the odontoid process-in our patient – the line does not intersect and is not tangential to the odontoid process-this confirms the abnormality and indicates the existence of occipito-atlas subluxation. The Chamberlain's line **(b) showed no associated basilar invagination.

Conclusion

1) The classical applied methodology of studying scoliotic patients should be modified in accordance with unusual findings. Particular attention and prompt assessment should be paid to other associated anomalies such as; unusual phenotypic features, musculoskeletal ligamentous hyperlaxity/articular stiffness, small hands or fingers (brachydactyly)/unusual long fingers (arachnodactyly), unusual long arm span (dolichostenomelia)/unusually short arms and or forearms (rhizomelia).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-1-15/MediaObjects/13013_2006_Article_15_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Coronal computed tomographic reconstructions demonstrating dislocation at C1-C2 and Subluxation of the occipito-atlas junction. Note C2 in the coronal position with the anterior arch of C1 overlying the left facet. Sphenoide bone, anterior part of occipital foramen (arrow).

2) We wish to stress on the significant role of CT scan as a diagnostic tool in the interpretation of different bone malformation complexes.

To our knowledge there have been no reports describing such changes in association with (SSS).

Abbreviations

(SSS): 

Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome

(AARF): 

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation

(OFC): 

Occipital-Frontal-Circumference

(Gravida 3 abortus 0): 

mother had 3 children and no history of spontaneous abortions.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

1) We wish to thank Dr. Michael Baraitser (Institute of Child Health-Clinical and Molecular Genetics-University College London) for his help in reviewing, editing and verifying this paper.

2) We thank Dr. Myriam Chaabounni (Charles Nicolle Hospital – department of Genetics for her technical help).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute of Osteology at the Hanusch Hospital of WGKK and AUVA Trauma Centre Meidling
(2)
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery-Children Hospital of Tunis
(3)
Center of Radiology-Department of Imaging Studies-Ibn Zohr Institute
(4)
Paediatric Department, Orthopaedic Hospital of Speising

References

  1. Andrea Herzka, Sponseller Paul, Pyeritz Reed: Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation in Patients With Marfan syndrome: A Report of Three Cases. Spine. 2000, 25 ((4)15): 524-526.
  2. Langer LO, Gorlin RJ, Donnai D, Hamel BC, Clericuzio C: Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome (with or without unilateral unsegmented bar). Am J Med Genet. 1994, 51: 1-8. 10.1002/ajmg.1320510102.PubMedView Article
  3. Seaver LH, Boyd E: Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome and cervical instability. Am J Med Genet. 2000, 91: 340-344. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000424)91:5<340::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO;2-N.PubMedView Article
  4. Harris JH, Carson GC, Wagner LK: Radiologic diagnosis of traumatic occipitovertebral dissociation. 2. Comparison of three methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994, 162: 887-892.PubMedView Article
  5. Chamberlain WE: Basilar impression/platybasia: Bizarre developmental anomaly of occipital bone and upper cervical spine with striking and misleading neurologic manifestations. Yale J Biol Med. 1939, 11: 487-496.PubMedPubMed Central
  6. Muniz AE, Belfer RA: Atlantoaxial rotary subluxation in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999, 15: 25-29.PubMedView Article
  7. Phillips WA, Hensinger RN: The management of rotatory atlanto-axial subluxation in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989, 71: 664-668.PubMed
  8. Corner EM: Rotatory dislocation of the atlas. Ann Surg. 1907, 45: 9-26.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  9. Burkus JK, Deponte RJ: Chronic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation correction by cervical traction, manipulation, and bracing. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986, 6: 631-635.PubMedView Article
  10. Coutts MB: Atlanto-epistropheal subluxations. Arch Surg. 1934, 29: 297-311.View Article
  11. Watson-Jones R: Spontaneous hyperaemic dislocation of the atlas. Proc.
  12. Chiapparini L, Zorzi G, De Simone T, Maccagnano C, Seaman B, Savoiardo M, Corona C, Nardocci N: Persistent fixed torticollis due to atlanto-axial rotatory fixation: report of 4 pediatric cases. Neuropediatrics. 2005, 36: 45-49. 10.1055/s-2004-830533.PubMedView Article
  13. Grisel P: Enucleation de l'atlas et torticollis nasopharyngien. Presse Med. 1930, 38: 50-
  14. Parke WW, Rothman RH, Brown MD: The pharyngovertebral veins. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1984, 66: 568-74.
  15. Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ: Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (fixed rotatory subluxation of the atlano-axial joint). J Bone Joint Surg(Am). 1977, 59-A: 37-44.
  16. Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ: Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1977, 58: 400-410.
  17. Hobbs W, Sponseller P, Weiss AC, Pyeritz R: The cervical spine in Marfan Syndrome. Spine. 1997, 22: 983-989. 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00010.PubMedView Article
  18. Akbarnia BA, Moe JH: Familial congenital scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar. Case report of two siblings. J Bone Joint Surg A. 1978, 60: 259-261.
  19. Ayme S, Preus M: Spondylocostal/spondylothoracic dysostosis: the clinical basis for prognosticating and genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet. 1986, 24: 599-606. 10.1002/ajmg.1320240403.PubMedView Article
  20. Coelho KEFA, Ramos ES, Felix TM, Martelli L, De pina Neto JM, Niikawa N: Three new cases of spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome: clinical and radiographic studies. Am J Med Genet. 1998, 77: 12-16. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19980428)77:1<12::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO;2-N.PubMedView Article
  21. Honeywell C, Langer L, Allanson J: Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis with epiphyseal dysplasia. Am J Med Genet. 2002, 109: 318-322. 10.1002/ajmg.10383.PubMedView Article
  22. Langer LO, Moe JH: A recessive form of congenital scoliosis different from STD. BDOAS. 1975, 11 (6): 83-86.
  23. Kaissi AA, Ghachem MB, Nassib N, Chehida FB, Kozlowski K: Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome (with a posterior midline unsegmented bar). Skelet Radiol. 2005, 34: 364-366. 10.1007/s00256-004-0869-4.View Article

Copyright

© Al Kaissi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement