Volume 4 Supplement 2

6th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities

Open Access

Validity of distances from the plumbline in sagittal plane deformities: repeatability, correlation with kyphosis angles and normative values

  • F Zaina1Email author,
  • A Negrini1,
  • S Atanasio1,
  • C Fusco1,
  • P Pizzetti1,
  • F Saveri1,
  • V Ziliani1 and
  • S Negrini1
Scoliosis20094(Suppl 2):O11

DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-4-S2-O11

Published: 14 December 2009

Objectives

To assess the repeatability of different methods of collection of the sagittal profile of patients with spinal deformities during everyday clinics to identify the most effective method.

Background

The sagittal plane measures have a relevant role both in Idiopathic Scoliosis and in Hyperkyphosis management. Nevertheless, clinical tools for everyday use are scarce and not adequately studied. In a previous study we evaluated the intra- and inter-rater repeatability and the measure error of the plumbline distance in AIS.

Methods

We performed 4 different studies in 4 different populations of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic and hyperkyphotic patients. In the first study we report the normative data of the plumbline measures in a general population of 180 adolescents. In the second study we compared the sagittal distances from the plumbline of C7, T12 and L3 with the measures of the Video Rasterstereography at the same levels and the angles of Kyphosis and Lordosis in 100 AIS patients. In the third study we evaluated the intra and inter-rater repeatability and the measurement error of kyphosis and lordosis angles measured with the Inclimed in 100 AIS patients. These data have been compared with the plumbline measures. In the last study we evaluated the repeatability of the sagittal distances from the plumbline by using a 1 mm change instead of 5 mm in a population of 40 patients. Statistical analysis: Repeatability has been evaluated according to Bland and Altman, to identify the limits of variation that are clinically significant.

Results

Study 1: the normative data were 34 ± 11 mm for C7 and 34 ± 15 mm for L3 for females and 34 ± 10 mm for C7 and 48 ± 10 mm for males. Study 2: a coefficient of correlation was calculated in order to compare measures. Study 3: the k value for Inclimed varied from fair to good. Study 4: the repeatability was fair for this measure.

Conclusion

Some clinical instruments are now available for sagittal plane assessment in AIS and Hyperkyphosis. The results of the present study give the limits during measurements in a clinical setting of parameter that are routinely collected by some clinicians.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute)

Copyright

© Zaina et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement