Volume 5 Supplement 1

7th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities

Open Access

Cross-validation of TRACE and eTRACE (Formetric TRACE) for aesthetics evaluation in scoliosis patients

  • Paolo Pizzetti1,
  • Claudia Fusco1,
  • Francesco Saveri1,
  • Fabio Zaina1 and
  • Stefano Negrini1
Scoliosis20105(Suppl 1):O7

DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-S1-O7

Published: 10 September 2010


The aesthetic issue is one of the main aim in the treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) as defined by SOSORT. TRACE is a tool, recently developed, which standardize the subjective medical experts evaluation and has shown a fair sensitivity and repeatability in the everyday clinical setting for the evaluation of aesthetics in IS patients. Recently, it was also successfully investigated the possibility to introduce a set of objectives aesthetic parameters obtained by 3D reconstruction of the shape of the back of IS patients through surface topography by Formetric (eTRACE). Since there is no gold-standard for aesthetic evaluation of IS, a correlation between two existing measures allow to validate them as measurements tool of the same underlying physiological phenomenon. Our aim was to evaluate if there was a correlation between TRACE and e-TRACE.

Materials and methods

The eTRACE of 30 scoliotic patients were obtained by 3D reconstruction via 4D Formetric device. TRACE have been blindly collected from the Formetric images of the same patients two times by three MD who regularly use TRACE in their daily practice. We calculated the correlation among TRACE and eTRACE. Then, to verify if high values of TRACE corresponded to high one of eTRACE, the population was divided in groups for the different sub-scales of TRACE and parameters of eTRACE and differences searched through appropriate statistics.


We found strong correlations for most of the waist parameters (R range 0,476-0,856, Rq 0,227-0,732), good for scapulae (with thoracic torsion: R 0,458 – Rq 0,210) and hemithorax (R 0,466 – Rq 0,217), fable for shoulders (with height difference: R 0,296 – Rq 0,09). Similar behaviours have been found classifying patients with one scale and looking at the other.


This study showed a very good correlation between TRACE and eTRACE for the waist parameters, while for the other ones a larger sample should be study to overcome the measurement error typical of TRACE.

Authors’ Affiliations

ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute)


© Pizzetti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.