The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation
© Beauséjour et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 June 2013
Accepted: 15 July 2013
Published: 24 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leah Carreon|
|29 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Sanders|
|29 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomasz Kotwicki|
|14 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marie Beausejour|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Sanders|
|15 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomasz Kotwicki|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1748-7161-8-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.