Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
© Kotani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 January 2013
Accepted: 18 August 2013
Published: 3 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Clements|
|13 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jack Cheng|
|15 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rene Marten Castelein|
|18 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerald Quan|
|24 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomasz Kotwicki|
|10 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toru Maruyama|
|12 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Toshiaki Kotani|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerald Quan|
|17 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomasz Kotwicki|
|17 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toru Maruyama|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1748-7161-8-15|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.