An observational study on surgically treated adult idiopathic scoliosis patients’ quality of life outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-ups and comparison to controls
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 March 2016
Accepted: 28 March 2017
Published: 12 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Mar 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cindy Marti|
|22 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Claude De Mauroy|
|31 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Theis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Claude De Mauroy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13013-017-0118-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.