Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 3 October 2016
Accepted: 23 May 2017
Published: 5 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas R. Orr|
|18 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toru Maruyama|
|17 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Niranjan Kavadi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toru Maruyama|
|4 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas R. Orr|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13013-017-0127-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.