| |
Ratios of brace/surgery in non-screening scenarios
|
|---|
| | |
20/80
|
30/70
|
40/60
|
50/50
|
60/40
|
70/30
|
|---|
|
Treatment rates in non-screening scenarios compared to screening
|
100%
|
37.0 (22 to 55)
|
29.7 (16 to 45)
|
22.4 (10 to 36)
|
15.1 (4 to 27)
|
7.8 (−2 to 18)
|
-0.5 (−8 to 9)
|
|
90%
|
27.6 (14 to 44)
|
21.0 (9 to 35)
|
14.5 (3 to 27)
|
7.9 (−2 to 19)
|
1.3 (−8 to 11)
|
- 5.3 (−13 to 3)
|
|
80%
|
18.2 (6 to 33)
|
12.4 (1 to 25)
|
6.5 (−4 to 18)
|
0.7 (−9 to 11)
|
- 5.2 (−14 to 4)
|
- 11.0 (−19 to −3)
|
|
70%
|
8.8 (−3 to 22)
|
3.7 (−7 to 15)
|
- 1.4 (−11 to 9)
|
- 6.5 (−15 to 3)
|
- 11.6 (−20 to −3)
|
- 16.8 (−24 to −9)
|
|
60%
|
- 0.6 (−11 to 11)
|
- 5.0 (−15 to 5)
|
- 9.3 (−18 to 0)
|
- 13.7 (−22 to −5)
|
- 18.0 (−26 to −10)
|
- 22.5 (−30 to −15)
|
- Mean 95% Crl are given for non-screening scenarios with treatment rates from 60% to 100% combined with different ratios of bracing to surgery from 20/80 to 70/30.
- Non-screening is more expensive with higher treatment rates and higher surgical rates compared with screening. Non-screening is less expensive with lower treatment rates and higher bracing rates compared to screening.
