Skip to main content

Table 1 Thoracic mobility in control and scoliosis subjects

From: The effect of scoliotic deformity on spine kinematics in adolescents

Group Author Flexion Extension Left Bending Right Bending
Control Galvis et al. 23.2 (11.8) 14.1 (10.1) 15.9 (8.2) 21.9 (12.2)
Poussa et al. 62.0 (9.1) −3.3 (14.1) 34.1 (7.3) 32.2 (7.0)
Mellin and Poussa 62.2–70.3 −4.0–13.0 65.8–82.6
Mellin et al. 62.0–69.2 −3.3–-2.6 34.1–37.2 32.2–35.5
Scoliosis Galvis et al. 18.1 (6.0) 11.4 (9.4) 13.1 (5.4) 16.8 (5.4)
Poussa et al. (G1) 58.6 (8.7) 18.2 (14.5) 35.2 (7.9) 33.6 (9.8)
Poussa et al. (G2) 59.9 (11.1) 15.9 (15.3) 34.2 (7.5) 32.6 (8.4)
Poussa et al. (G3) 50.9 (12.6) 16.5 (19.1) 37.5 (7.8) 25.4 (12.5
Rahmatalla et al. 28.8 12.1 30.2 28.4
  1. Values presented are mean range of motion values with standard deviation values presented in parentheses where available. The number of subjects varied by bending mode in Galvis et al.: Flexion (n = 5), extension (n = 10), and left and right lateral bending (n = 11). The groups presented for Poussa et al. represented divisions by Cobb angle, with Group 1 having <25° Cobb angles, Group 2 having 25–35° Cobb angle, and Group 3 having Cobb angles >35°