Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quality of life and patient satisfaction in bracing treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M S Wong
3 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Deceuninck
6 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Lucas Piantoni
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Deceuninck
22 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M S Wong
28 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edyta Kinel
2 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Claude De Mauroy
30 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Lucas Piantoni
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Claude De Mauroy
17 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M S Wong
4 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Lucas Piantoni
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M S Wong
25 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Claude De Mauroy
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
14 Dec 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13013-018-0172-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement