Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Cheng |
| 19 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorenzo Aulisa |
| 23 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - deborah goodall |
| 6 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Eustace Johnson |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Cheng |
| 14 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorenzo Aulisa |
| 18 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - deborah goodall |
| 24 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Eustace Johnson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Cheng |
| 2 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - deborah goodall |
| 5 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Eustace Johnson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 13 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Eustace Johnson |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-7161-4-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.