Volume 4 Supplement 1

5th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities

Open Access

Curve pattern changes in idiopathic scoliosis

  • Joris Hermus1,
  • F vd Berg1,
  • N Guldemond1,
  • A v Ooij1 and
  • L v Rhijn1
Scoliosis20094(Suppl 1):O13

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-S1-O13

Published: 15 January 2009

Introduction

Ponseti and Friedman suggest that curve type is genetically determined and that curve types do not change throughout its course. Nowadays, we see scoliosis as a more dynamic process. Therefore we ask ourselves can the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis can change during growth when the scoliosis is not treated.

Aim

The goal of this study was to assess curve pattern changes in patients with idiopathic scoliosis who were not treated.

Materials and methods

Forty eight patients were monitored who were not treated and had an idiopathic scoliosis. Curve pattern changes were classified according the SRS.

Results

Forty eight patients (11 boys and 37 girls; 13 patients younger than 10 years and 35 patients older than 10 years) were monitored for a mean follow-up of 3 to 4 years. 8 patients (17%) showed changes in curve patterns. Six of these patients were younger than 10 years, while 2 patients were older than 10 years. There was no correlation between the curve severity and the curve pattern changes. We found no significant difference between the male and female patients. Single curves changed in double curves and vice versa during growth in 70% younger than 10 years and 18% older than 10 years.

Conclusion

In this study, changes in curve patterns suggest that idiopathic scoliosis is not a fixed deformity, but a dynamic process especially in patients younger than 10 years.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Academic Hospital Maastricht

References

  1. Ponseti IV, Friedman B: Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950, 32A: 381-395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Van Rhijn LW, Plasmans CM, Veraart BE: Changes in curve pattern after brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002, 73: 277-81. 10.1080/000164702320155248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Miller NH, Justice CM, Marosy B: Familial idiopathic scoliosis: evidence of X-linked susceptibility locus. Presented at: The Scoliosis Research Society 36th Annual Meeting; Cleveland, Ohio. 2001Google Scholar
  4. Cowell HR, Hall JN, MacEwen GD: Genetic aspects of idiopathic scoliosis. A Nicholas Andry Award essay, 1970. Clin Orthop. 1972, 86: 121-31. 10.1097/00003086-197207000-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hermus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement