Volume 8 Supplement 2
Not only being compliant, but also being constant in brace wearing improves short-term results: a prospective Thermobrace study
© Donzelli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Published: 18 September 2013
Compliance, together with quality of bracing, have shown to achieve good results in scoliotic patients. However, nothing is known about constant brace wearing (CBW), which means maintaining the same number of hours almost every day. CBW is recommended at each brace prescription, but is it true that being constant will bring the best results?
The goal of this study was to find out if CBW is rewarded with better bracing results in the short term.
Prospective controlled cohort study nested into a clinical database started in 2003. On December 31, 2012, out of 11,800 patients in the database, we selected 168 who met the following inclusion criteria: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Sforzesco brace prescription 18 to 23 hours/day, at least four months of observation, Thermobrace (TB) adoption and out-of-brace x-ray before treatment. CBW (104 patients) was compared to fickle-brace wearing (FBW: 64): due to the abnormal distribution of TB values, one hour in the inter-quartile range distinguished the two groups. A 6-degree Cobb cut-off was defined to classify results as improved, worsened or stabilized. Patients were also classified for compliance: High (HC: >95% of prescription), Middle (MC: 70-94%) and Low (LC: <70%). For statistical analysis, chi-square test has been used; the relative risk (RR) of not improvement (i.e., progression or stabilization only) with 95% Confidence Interval (IC95) has been calculated as well.
Males were more frequent in FBW (78.1% vs 12.5% in CBW – P<0.0001). CBW-HC showed a high percentage of improved and stabilized curves (44.2% and 28.8% ) when compared to FBW (10.9% and 10.9%). CBW are frequently HC, 81.7% versus 21.8% in FBW (P<0.0001). In both groups, HC were more frequent in the group of prescription over 22h per day, while the severity of scoliosis did not affect compliance or CBW. Without distinctions for compliance, RR in the short-term for FBW was 1.35 (IC95: 0.95-1.93 – P=0.08). FBW-MC/LC, compared to CBW-HC showed a RR of 1.50 (IC95: 1.0-2.3 - P=0.04).
Conclusions and discussion
Wearing a brace rigorously (HC) and constantly (CBW) provides good results, and this remains true in MC. Compliance to prescription is fundamental to a higher probability of achieving good results, but FBW can represent a risk for progression. Future studies should document these data at the end of treatment.
- Katz DE, Durrani AA: Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2001, 26 (21): 2354-2361. 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brox JI, Lange JE, Gunderson RB, Steen H: Good brace compliance reduced curve progression and surgical rates in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2012, 21 (10): 1957-63. 10.1007/s00586-012-2386-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tavernaro M, Pellegrini A, Tessadri F, Zaina F, Zonta A, Negrini S: Team care to cure adolescents with braces (avoiding low quality of life, pain and bad compliance): a case-control retrospective study. 2011 SOSORT Award winner. Scoliosis. 2012, 7 (1): 17. 10.1186/1748-7161-7-17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.