Skip to content


  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Scoliosis and sagittal balance in Parkinson’s disease: analysis of correlations

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Scoliosis20138 (Suppl 2) :O7

  • Published:


  • Pelvic Tilt
  • Lumbar Lordosis
  • Thoracic Kyphosis
  • Pelvic Incidence
  • Sagittal Balance


Information concerning scoliosis in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and its correlations with sagittal balance (SB) is sparse.


The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of scoliosis in PD patients and the existing correlations with SB in relation to the spinopelvic morphology.


A total of 48 consecutive PD patients were included: 36 males, 12 females; 70.8±7.6 years; 6.4±4.1 years of disease (YOD); Hoehn Yahr (HY) 2.7±1.2. The clinical assessment included HY score, Pain NRS 0-10 and trunk rotation in bending (ATR). Lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), scoliosis curves (SC), spinosacral angle (SSA), spinopelvic angle (SPA), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT) were radiographically assessed. Patients have been compared according to the presence of SC >10° (PDts) Cobb or the absence of SC (PDns).


Among the study subjects, 47.9% presented a SC larger than 10°, 84% of the patients in PDts presented a thoracolumbar curve, 10% a thoracic curve and 6% a lumbar curve. The cohort did not present differences with PDns about age (71.8±6.0 vs. 69.8±8.8yrs) and YOD (6.1±4.1 vs. 6.6±4.1 years). No differences have been detected for HY score (2.7±1.2 vs. 2.6±1.6) and NRS (29.6±22.6 vs. 19.4±28.1). ATR was higher in PDts (5.6±4.9 vs. 1.3±1.9, p<0.01). TK (46.4±16.1 vs. 46.9±12.1°), LL (46.3±26.9 vs. 49.3±13.9°), SSA (104.8±24.7 vs. 118.6±12.9°) and SPA (152.4±20.3 vs. 153.4±12.5°) were not different (p>0.05). PI (57.8±11.1 vs. 53.9±13.1°) and PT (23.6±13.7 vs. 17.6±8.6°) were slightly but not statistically different, while SS was not (35.3±12.1 vs. 36.0±8.5°).

Conclusions and discussion

The prevalence of scoliosis in PD was higher than previously described by other authors, with the thoracolumbar spine mostly affected. SB was not different between two groups while, in PDts, spinopelvic parameters presented the tendency to have a larger PI and PT.

Authors’ Affiliations

Rehabilitation Service, Casa di Cura Domus Salutis, Brescia, Italy


  1. Koller H, Acosta F, Zenner J, Ferraris L, Hitzl W, Meier O, Ondra S, Koski T, Schmidt R: Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine. Spine J. 2010, 19 (10): 1785-94. 10.1007/s00586-010-1405-y. Epub 2010 Apr 27View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Doherty KM, van de Warrenburg BP, Peralta MC, Silveira-Moriyama L, Azulay JP, Gershanik OS, Bloem BR: Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10 (6): 538-549. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70067-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baik JS, Kim JY, Park JH, Han SW, Park JH, Lee MS: Scoliosis in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Clin Neurol. 2009, 5 (2): 91-94. 10.3988/jcn.2009.5.2.91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Bissolotti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.