Table 1 The eight cases and the various measures recorded are depicted. Angles are measured in degrees and lengths are expressed as percentage of the total length. Major aesthetic disfigurements are highlighted in pink
Sl No. | Name | Age | Gender | Neck tilt Le | Neck base Le | Trap Le | Neck center diff | Sh level | Ax level | Scap level | Scap prom | Arm width diff | Arm drop Le | clinical impression | Who noticed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIZ | 16 | M | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0.044 | 6 | 2 | na | na | 0 | 10 | neck, sho | Dr |
2 | JT | 15.5 | M | 2 | 18 | 10 | 4.40Â % | 3 | 1 | 2 | yes | 7.70Â % | 8 | Neck | Pt/Dr |
3 | A | 14 | M | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3.64Â % | 10 | 4 | 15 | yes | 18.50Â % | 0 | Shoulder | Pt/Dr |
4 | NMMJ | 14.5 | F | na | na | na | na | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9.10Â % | 10 | shoulder | Pt/Dr |
5 | RH | 14.5 | M | 3 | 6 | 9 | 4.76Â % | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Neck | Dr |
6 | FR | 13.5 | F | na | na | na | na | 7 | 5 | 1 | Yes | 25Â % | 0 | shoulder | Pt/Dr |
7 | AJ | 17.5 | F | 0 | 7 | 8 | 0.05 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 21.21Â % | 1 | shoulder | Pt/Dr |
8 | SS | 15 | F | 2 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | yes | 6.67Â % | 0 | neck, sho | Pt/Dr |
Mean | 15.063 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
SD | Â | 1.27 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |