Skip to main content

Table 4 Overview of risk-of-bias assessments of all included studies and total score

From: Does postural stability differ between adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and typically developed? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Author/year

Risk-of-bias selection

Risk-of-bias comparability

Risk-of-bias exposure/outcome

Total score

0–6 points

Item 1

Item 2

Item 3

Item 4

Item 5

Item 6

Sahli et al. 2013 [42]

1

1

1

0

1

1

5

Park et al. 2013 [43]

0

1

0

0

1

1

3

De Santiago et al. 2013 [44]

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

Stylianides et al. 2013 [45]

0

1

0

0

1

1

3

Gruber et al. 2011 [46]

0

1

1

0

1

1

3

Dalleau et al. 2011 [47]

0

1

1

0

1

1

4

Valles et al. 2009 [48]

0

1

0

0

1

0

2

Beaulieu et al. 2009 [49]

1

1

1

0

1

1

5

Zabjek et al. 2008 [50]

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

Dalleau et al. 2007 [51]

0

1

0

0

1

1

3

Simoneau, et al. 2006 [52]

0

1

0

0

1

1

3

Chow et al. 2006 [53]

1

1

0

0

1

1

4

Simoneau et al. 2006 [54]

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

Allard et al. 2004 [55]

1

1

0

0

1

1

4

Silferi et al. 2004 [56]

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

Nault et al. 2002 [57]

0

0

0

0

1

1

2

Chen et al. 1998 [58]

0

1

0

0

1

1

3

Sahlstrand et al. 1978 [59]

1

1

0

0

1

1

4

  1. Item 1: Is the control group representative for normal adolescents? 1 = Community control; 0 = Hospital controls/No description of source. Item 2: Was other pathology excluded that possibly influences the outcome? 1 = Yes; 0 = No or no description. Item 3: Were the same in- and exclusion criteria (except for the spinal deformity) used for AIS and healthy adolescents? 1 = Yes; 0 = No or no description. Item 4: Were the observers blinded to AIS/healthy adolescent status1 = Yes; 0 = No or not documented. Item 5: Was the data collection performed in the same standardised way for AIS cases and healthy adolescents? 1 = Yes; 0 = No or not documented. Item 6: Was the primary outcome parameter for AIS cases and healthy adolescents available? 1 = Available for > 90% of AIS and healthy adolescents, 0 = available for < 90% of AIS or healthy adolescents. Total score: Ranked according to total score; 0–2 high, 3–4 moderate and 5–6 low risk of bias