Spine deformities in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type IV - late results of surgical treatment

  • Barbara Jasiewicz1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Tomasz Potaczek1,

      Affiliated with

      • Maciej Tesiorowski1 and

        Affiliated with

        • Krzysztof Lokas1

          Affiliated with

          Scoliosis20105:26

          DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-26

          Received: 19 April 2010

          Accepted: 25 November 2010

          Published: 25 November 2010

          Abstract

          Background

          Spinal deformities in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome are usually progressive and may require operative treatment. There is limited number of studies describing late results of surgery in this disease.

          Methods

          This is a retrospective study of the records of 11 patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, treated surgically between 1990 and 2007. All patients underwent surgical treatment for spinal deformity. Duration of operation, type of instrumentation, intraoperative blood loss, complications and number of additional surgeries were noted. Radiographic measurement was performed on standing AP and lateral radiographs acquired before surgery, just after and at final follow up.

          Results

          The mean follow up period was 5.5 ± 2.9 years (range 1-10 years). The mean preoperative thoracic and lumbar curve were 109.5 ± 19.9° (range 83° - 142°) and 75.6 ± 26.7° (range 40° - 108°) respectively. Posterior spine fusion alone was performed on 6 patients and combined anterior and posterior fusion (one- or two stage) on 5 cases. Posterior segmental spinal instrumentation was applied with use of hooks, screws and wires. The mean postoperative thoracic and lumbar curve improved to 79.3 ± 16.1° (range 56° - 105°) and 58.5 ± 27.7° (range 10° - 95°) respectively, with a slight loss of correction during follow up. The average thoracic and lumbar correction was 26.4 ± 14.9% (range 5.3 - 50.4%) and 26.3 ± 21.2% (range 7.9 - 75%). Postoperatively, the mean kyphosis was 79.5 ± 40.3° (range 21° -170°), and lordosis was 50.8 ± 18.6° (range 20° -79°). Hyperkyphosis increased during follow up while lordosis remained stable. Mean Th12-L2 angle was -3.5 ±9.9° (range -19° - 15°) postoperatively and did not change significantly during follow up.

          Conclusions

          Huge spinal deformities in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome require complex and extensive surgery. There is a big risk of sagittal imbalance in this group.

          Background

          Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a group of different inherited diseases caused by various defects of collagen metabolism [1]. It is characterized by joint hypermobility and joint laxity. From the description of the first patient by van Meckeren in 1682, it had to pass over 200 years until Ehlers and Danlos published their works and disease called from their names was identified. Current classification consists of 6 types with different genetic abnormalities and various clinical manifestations [2]. Kyphoscoliotic type (type IV) with the deficiency of lysyl hydroxylase, a collagen modifying enzyme, is of the most interest to orthopedists. Patients suffer from generalized joint laxity, muscle hypotonia at birth, progressive scoliosis and fragility of sclera with risk of ocular globe rupture. Spinal deformity, which typically involves both thoracic and lumbar spine, occurs as scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis and is visible just after birth [3]. Curve progression is rapid and operative treatment is often indicated, however, surgery is not such a simple procedure as in idiopathic scoliosis [4, 5].

          Surgery is much more difficult due to stiff deformity and is connected with significant risk of serious complications [5, 6]. That is why individual approach to the treatment of these patients may be advisable. However, there are limited number of studies describing late results of operative treatment in patients with Ehlers Danlos syndrome.

          The objective of this study was retrospective analysis of spinal deformities in patients with Ehlers Danlos syndrome. In addition we evaluated late results of operative treatment.

          Methods

          This is a retrospective study of the records of patients with Ehlers Danlos syndrome type IV, treated surgically between 1990 and 2007. Material consists of 11 patients: 5 females and 6 males. The mean age at the onset of deformity was 1.6 ± 0.9 years (range 1-2.5years).

          All patients had plano-valgus feet, treated operatively in 2 cases. Pectus excavatum was observed in 6 cases, pectus carinatum - in 1 case. Two patients underwent surgical correction of chest deformity. Scoliosis was present in all cases, in all but two it was kyphoscoliosis. Lenke classification was used to categorize the curve types, so type 1 was present in 7 cases, type 3 - in 3 cases and type 5 - in 1 case.

          All patients underwent surgical treatment for spinal deformity.

          We reviewed preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative records of all patients and noted duration of operation, type of instrumentation, intraoperative blood loss, complications and number of additional surgeries.

          Radiographic measurement was performed on standing AP and lateral radiographs acquired before surgery, just after and at final follow up. Preoperative coronal curve flexibility was assessed with use of elongation radiographs. We analyzed: structural curve magnitude according to Cobb, apical vertebral translation (AVT), distance between Th1 and central sacral line (Th1-CSL), trunk shift, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, and Th12-L2 angle.

          Due to a small number of patients only basic statistical analysis was performed, data are presented as proportions (%) or as mean with standard deviations and range.

          Results

          All patients underwent last clinical and radiographic examination after puberty. The mean follow up period was 5.5 ± 2.9 years (range 1-10 years) and mean age at latest examination was 19.3 ± 3.9 years (range 14.2-24.8 years).

          Before spine fusion

          The mean age at the first radiogram (available for authors) was 7 ± 5 years (range 2-15 years). The mean Cobb angle of the thoracic curve was 76.3 ± 37.5° (range 11° -142°) and mean angle of the lumbar curve was 60.9 ± 24,2° (range 38° -108°). All patients underwent various non-effective conservative treatment: different exercises and braces (outside our hospital). Spine correction without fusion according to Moe was applied in 5 cases. These patients underwent 3-6 operations with additional distraction before the main surgery.

          Pre-operative data

          The mean age at the time of spine fusion was 13.8 ± 3 years (range 7-18 years).

          The mean preoperative thoracic and lumbar curve were 109.5 ± 19.9° (range 83° - 142°) and 75.6 ± 26.7° (range 40° - 108°) respectively. Preoperative flexibility of scoliosis curve was smaller in thoracic than in lumbar region and equaled 22.0 ± 11.6% (range 2.5 - 42.3%) and 27.2 ± 5.2% (range 18 - 32%) respectively. The mean apical vertebral rotation was 76.8 ± 34.2 mm (range 18 - 140 mm) in thoracic spine, and 25.5 ± 15.4 mm (range 0 - 43 mm) in lumbar spine.

          The mean absolute value of the distance Th1-CSL was 15 ± 12.4 mm (range 0 - 37). The mean preoperative trunk shift was 17.0 ± 19.0 mm (range -20 - 45 mm). Preoperative thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis were 89.1 ± 31.2° (range 32° - 150°) and 55.9 ± 17.3° (20° - 78°) respectively. The value of the Th12-L2 angle varied significantly, with mean preoperative angle 2.6 ± 23.2° (range -36° - 40°).

          Spine fusion

          We performed posterior spine fusion alone on 6 patients and combined anterior and posterior fusion (one- or two stage) on 5 cases. Additionally, at the same time thoracoplasty was carried out to improve rib hump in 2 cases. Posterior segmental spinal instrumentation was applied in all cases, with use of hooks, pedicular screws, sublaminar or translaminar wires - depending on technical possibilities and when patients were operated on. The mean operation time was 4.2 ± 2.6 hours (range 2.5 - 6 hours). Number of fused vertebra was 11.4 ± 2.6 (range 6 - 14) on average. The mean blood loss was 818 ± 520 ml (range 200 - 1800 ml). There were no intraoperative complications.

          During the follow up 4 patients underwent reoperations due to increasing imbalance, instrumentation failure - primary causes were pseudoarthroses in the fused area. Costoplasty improving trunk shape was performed in 2 patients during the follow up.

          Post-operative data

          The mean postoperative thoracic and lumbar curve improved to 79.3 ± 16.1° (range 56° - 105°) and 58.5 ± 27.7° (range 10° - 95°) respectively. The average thoracic and lumbar correction percentage was 26.4 ± 14.9% (range 5.3 - 50.4%) and 26.3 ± 21.2% (range 7.9 - 75%) respectively. There was slight loss of correction during the follow up period, and finally mean thoracic and lumbar curve was 85.2 ± 12.6° (range 65° - 100°) and 60.8 ± 23.7° (range 15° - 88°) at last examination. Final correction equaled 20.1 ± 16.6% (range 0 - 50.4%) and 22.2 ± 25.6% (range -15.8 - 62.5%) respectively. Other coronal plane results are presented in Table 1 (Table 1). After surgery, the mean kyphosis was 79.5 ± 40.3° (range 21° -170°), and lordosis was 50.8 ± 18.6° (range 20° -79°). Thoraco-lumbar junction was slightly lordotic or plane, and mean Th12-L2 angle was -3.5 ± 9.9° (range -19° - 15°). Hyperkyphosis increased during the follow up and at last examination mean kyphosis was 94.5 ± 43.6° (range 18° -180°) (additional file 1). Lordosis remained stable during the follow up and was 50.2 ± 28.2° (range 12°-90°) on average. The mean Th12-L2 angle did not change significantly during the follow up and at last examination it was -3.1 ± 22.2° (range -40° - 40°) (Figure 1).
          Table 1

          Coronal balance data before and after treatment

           

          Before surgery

          After surgery

          After follow up

          Thoracic AVT

          76.8 ± 32.5 mm

          (range 18-140 mm)

          62.5 ± 29.3 mm

          (range 21-120 mm)

          59.4 ± 17.2 mm

          (range 35- 82 mm)

          Lumbar AVT

          25.5 ± 15.4 mm

          (range 0-43 mm)

          30.4 ± 18.7 mm

          (range 3- 63 mm)

          33.9 ± 21.7 mm

          (range 0- 64 mm)

          Absolute Th1-CSL value

          15 ± 13.1 mm

          (range 0-37 mm)

          32 ± 18.4 mm

          (range 5-60 mm)

          27 ± 21.8 mm

          (range 3-60 mm)

          Trunk shift

          17.0 ± 20.5 mm

          (range -20-45 mm)

          8.8 ± 18.3 mm

          (range -20 - 30 mm)

          19.3 ± 15.2 mm

          (range 0 - 45 mm)

          AVT = apical vertebral rotation

          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-5-26/MediaObjects/13013_2010_Article_405_Fig1_HTML.jpg
          Figure 1

          The results of sagittal parameters: kyphosis, lordosis and Th12-L2 angle.

          Discussion

          Etiopathogenesis of collagen defects in Ehlers Danlos syndrome has been already described quite well. One of the most striking symptoms of the disease is kyphoscoliosis, seen in type IV of syndrome. In our patients the onset of spine deformity was assessed below 4th year of life, similarly to patients of McMaster [4]. This deformity is caused by muscle hypotonia and loose ligaments and it can increase to a huge degree. To our knowledge conservative treatment is ineffective. Operative treatment of kyphoscoliosis in Ehlers Danlos syndrome is difficult, and described by other authors "satisfying result" meant certain correction with deformity stabilization, without perfect restoration of sagittal contour [4, 7]. Main preoperative curve exceeded 80° in all our patients. Thus, curves were severe with additional disturbances of sagittal contour (Figure 2, 3, 4, 5). Achieved correction of scoliotic deformity was not big, only just above 26%, comparable to spinal elasticity. Bigger correction was reported by McMaster and Yang, but their patients had minor degree of deformity [4, 8]. Also brilliant correction was described by Russian authors on 8 patients, but detailed information about this patients' group was not available for us [9]. Blood loss did not exceed 2000 ml in our group and no vascular complications were observed - neither avulsion of segmental arteries via anterior approach nor tear of external iliac artery [58]. We did not see any temporary or permanent neurological complications. Coronal plane correction remained stable during follow up and the smaller preoperative curve, the bigger percentage of correction was obtained. Sagittal balance remained a challenging problem; starting with first radiograms, the significant tendency for hyperkyphosis was observed. We found that all 5 patients treated primarily with correction without fusion had increasing kyphosis above the upper end of instrumentation. Generally, kyphosis was stiff, with poor correction during spondylodesis. During follow up sagittal profile worsened, although lordosis and Th12-L2 did not changed significantly, we observed increasing hyperkyphosis. Further reoperations were bound with sagittal imbalance. It is worth emphasizing that due to low frequency of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, this retrospective study covers years between 1990 and 2007, thus possible operative techniques were limited in the beginning and varied during time.
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-5-26/MediaObjects/13013_2010_Article_405_Fig2_HTML.jpg
          Figure 2

          Patient No1, boy, age at surgery: 14 yrs. Good result after 4 years of follow up. A- AP radiogram before surgery: Cobb angle 105°, B- L radiogram before surgery: kyphosis angle 116°, C- AP radiogram 4 years after surgery: Cobb angle 60°, D- L radiogram 4 years after surgery: kyphosis 82°.

          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-5-26/MediaObjects/13013_2010_Article_405_Fig3_HTML.jpg
          Figure 3

          Patient No11, male, age at surgery: 17 yrs. A - AP and L radiograms before surgery, scoliosis angle: 135°, B- radiogram - an oblique view (acc. to Stagnara), C- AP and L radiograms after surgery, D- AP and L radiograms 6 years after surgery. Quite good result, although both coronal and sagittal balance is not ideal.

          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-5-26/MediaObjects/13013_2010_Article_405_Fig4_HTML.jpg
          Figure 4

          Patient No7, female, age at spinal fusion: 12 yrs. A- first AP and L radiograms at the age of 5; B - correction without fusion (Moe technique); C- at the age of 12, just before spinal fusion. Hyperkyphosis above instrumentation.

          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1748-7161-5-26/MediaObjects/13013_2010_Article_405_Fig5_HTML.jpg
          Figure 5

          Patient No7, next radiograms: A - after spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation (still kyphosis in upper thoracic region - too short extent of fusion?); B - at the age of 14, spinal decompensation; C- after reoperation: costoplasty, removal of instrumentation, new posterior stabilization at the area of pseudoarthrosis; D- last examination - at the age of 21. Hyperkyphosis, sagittal imbalance.

          Conclusions

          Huge spinal deformities in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome require complex and extensive surgery.

          There is a big risk of sagittal imbalance in this group.

          Declarations

          Acknowledgements

          Each author certifies that he has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interests, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All authors give their consent to publish this study and accompanying data.

          Study was performed as a part of Research Project No NN 518412936, Polish State Committee for Scientific Research.

          Authors’ Affiliations

          (1)
          Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Jagiellonian University, College of Medicine

          References

          1. Giunta C, Superti-Furga A, Spranger S, Cole WG, Steinmann B: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VII: clinical features and molecular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81 (2) : 225–38.PubMed
          2. Beighton P, De Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ: Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers-Danlos support group (UK). Am J Med Genet 1998, 77 (1) : 31–7.PubMedView Article
          3. Beighton P, Horan FT: Orthopaedic aspects of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1969, 51 (3) : 444–53.PubMed
          4. McMaster MJ: Spinal deformity in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Five patients treated by spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994, 76 (5) : 773–777.PubMed
          5. Vogel LC, Lubicky JP: Neurologic and vascular complications of the scoliosis surgery in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. A case report. Spine 1996, 21 (21) : 2508–2514.
          6. Debnath UK, Sharma H, Roberts D, Kumar N, Ahuja S: Coeliac axis thrombosis after surgical correction of spinal deformity in the type VI Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Spine 2007, 32 (18) : E528–31.PubMedView Article
          7. Akpinar S, Gogus A, Talu U, Hamzaoglu A, Dikici F: Surgical management of the spinal deformity in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI. Eur Spine J 2003, 12 (2) : 135–40.PubMed
          8. Yang JS, Sponseller PD, Muharrem Yazici, Johnston CE: Vascular complications from anterior spine surgery in three patients with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Spine 2009, 34 (4) : E153–157.PubMedView Article
          9. Pozdnikin IuI, Ryzhakov IuP: [Kypho-scoliotic deformities of the spine in children and adolescents with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and their treatment]. Ortop Travmatol Protez 1990, (11) : 5–10.PubMed

          Copyright

          © Jasiewicz et al. 2010

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.