Volume 7 Supplement 1

8th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities and SOSORT 2011 Annual Meeting

Open Access

Study on the impact of the angular value of scoliosis, the number and lenght of the curves on physical capacity of affected girls

  • D Czaprowski1,
  • T Kotwicki2,
  • R Biernat1 and
  • A Ronikier3
Scoliosis20127(Suppl 1):O61

DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-S1-O61

Published: 27 January 2012

Purpose of the study

To determine the influence of the scoliosis angle, the number and the length of the curves on physical capacity of affected girls.

Background

Physical capacity determines the organism’s ability to make a physical effort, to tolerate dysfunctions of endogenous homeostasis caused by the physical effort and to quickly regain balance [1][2]. Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a systemic disease affecting function of the cardiopulmonary system and impairing patient’s physical capacity [3, 5, 6].

Materials and methods

Ninety-seven girls, aged 10 to18, seventy idiopathic scoliosis and 27 controls participated in the study. To determine the physical capacity, the indirect method comprising the PWC170 test was used and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max, l/min) was calculated [3, 5]. Girls with moderate IS (Cobb 25°-40°) and mild IS (Cobb up to 25°) were analyzed separately.

Results

The VO2 max value (l/min) and the PWC170 index were significantly lower in girls with moderate IS compared to control group. No difference was found between mild IS and controls. No influence of the number of curves and the length of scoliosis on VO2 max (l/min; ml/kg/min) and the absolute capacity value (W) was found. A significantly lower value of the PWC 170(W/kg) index was observed in girls with double scoliosis and girls having the curve over 9 vertebrae.

Conclusions

Girls with moderate IS presented lower VO2 max compared to controls. Physical capacity of mild IS was not significantly different from controls. Girls with double scoliosis and girls having the curve over 9 vertebrae had a significantly lower value of the PWC 170 (W/kg) index, moreover no significant effects were found for VO2 max and PWC 170 (W).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Physiotherapy, Józef Rusiecki University College in Olsztyn
(2)
University of Medical Sciences
(3)
Faculty of Rehabilitation, Academy of Physical Education

References

  1. Astrand PO, Rodahl K: Textbook of work physiology. 1986, New York: Mc Graw HillGoogle Scholar
  2. Cleland V, Wyder T, Blizzard L, Venn A: The provision of compulsory school physical activity: Associations with physical activity, fitness and overweight in childhood and twenty years later. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008, 5: 14. 10.1186/1479-5868-5-14. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-14PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Coast JR, Cline CC: The effect of chest wall restriction on exercise capacity. Respirology. 2004, 9: 197-203. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00559.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Durmała J, Tomalak W, Kotwicki T: Function of the respiratory system in patients with idiopathic scoliosis: reasons for impairment and methods of evaluation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008, 135: 237-245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hawkins MN, Raven PB, Snell PG, Stray-Gundersen J, Levine BD: Maximal oxygen uptake as a parametric measure of cardiorespiratory capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007, 39: 103-107. 10.1249/01.mss.0000241641.75101.64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Koumbourlis AC: Scoliosis and the respiratory system. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2006, 7: 152-160. 10.1016/j.prrv.2006.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Czaprowski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement