Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Repeatability of the Aesthetic Index for adolescent scoliosis idiopathic evaluation

  • 1443 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Objective

To evaluate the intra- and inter-rater repeatability of the Aesthetic Index (AI) and its sub-scores.

Study design

Since many years in our Institute we have used a clinical tool to evaluate the aesthetics of the trunks posteriorly. This is based on a three point scale for asymmetry (0 absent, 1 slight, 2 important) of the shoulders, scapulae and flanks; the sum of these sub-scores gives the AI. One hundred sixty posterior anterior photographs of the trunk of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were scored two times independently by three observers. We used the Kappa statistics [1]: 0–0.2 poor, 0.2–0.4 fair, 0.4–0.6 moderate, 0.6–0.8 good, 0.8–1.0 very good. The 95% level of agreement was used to identify the minimum clinically significant change to be considered between two different clinical examinations.

Results

See Table 1.

Table 1 Results.

Conclusion

The intra-raters agreement is between moderate and good for single sub-scores, and fair for the AI, as it happens for the inter-raters agreement. The AI and its sub-scores can be used in the everyday clinical practice, but a change of 2 points for sub-scores, and 3 for AI is required to reach clinical significance, and this gives to the AI a low sensitivity.

References

  1. 1.

    Altman DG: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1991, London: Chapman and Hall

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stefano Negrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaina, F., Negrini, S., Monticone, M. et al. Repeatability of the Aesthetic Index for adolescent scoliosis idiopathic evaluation. Scoliosis 2, S46 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-2-S1-S46

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Clinical Practice
  • Clinical Significance
  • Clinical Examination
  • Point Scale