- Oral presentation
- Open Access
The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
© Sánchez Raya et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Published: 27 January 2012
- Ceiling Effect
- Idiopathic Scoliosis
- Floor Effect
- Valid Instrument
- Radiographic Study
Outcome assessment in idiopathic scoliosis should probably include patients’ perception of their trunk deformity in addition to self-image. This can be accomplished with the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) [1–4]. Nevertheless, this instrument has some shortcomings. These considerations prompted us to design the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS).
Patients with idiopathic scoliosis and no prior surgical treatment were included. Each patient completed the TAPS and SRS-22 questionnaire and underwent a complete radiographic study of the spine [5, 6]. The magnitude of the upper thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar structural curves was recorded. The TAPS includes 3 sets of figures that depict the trunk from 3 viewpoints: looking toward the back, looking toward the head with the patient bending over and looking toward the front. Drawings are scored from 1 (greatest deformity) to 5 (smallest deformity), and a mean score is obtained.
A total of 186 patients (86% females), with a mean age of 17.8 years participated. The mean of the largest curve (CMAX) was 40.2°. The median of TAPS sum score was 3.6. The floor effect was 1.6% and ceiling effect 3.8%. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.89; the ICC for the mean sum score was 0.92. Correlation coefficient of the TAPS mean sum and CMAX was -0.55 (P < 0.01). Correlation coefficients between TAPS mean sum score and SRS-22 scales were all statistically significant, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 (P < 0.05).
The TAPS is a valid instrument for evaluating the perception patients have of their trunk deformity.
- Sanders JO, Polly DW, Cats-Baril W, Jones JA, Lenke LG, O'Brien MF: Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter-Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine. 2003, 28: 2158-2163. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084629.97042.0B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Bridwell KH, Diab M: The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire. Results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2007, 32 (24): 2719-2722. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5959.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pineda S, Bago J, Climent JM, Gilperez C: Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjectiveperception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2006, 1: 18-10.1186/1748-7161-1-18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bago J, Climent JM, Pineda S, Gilperez C: Further evaluation of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale: correlation with curve pattern and radiological deformity. Scoliosis. 2007, 2: 12-10.1186/1748-7161-2-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B: Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine. 2003, 28 (1): 74-78. 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJ, Izquierdo E: The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine. 2004, 29 (15): 1676-1680. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000132306.53942.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.