Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The influence of body mass index (BMI) on the reproducibility of surface topography measurements

  • 1991 Accesses

  • 9 Citations

Background

Surface Topography can be used to evaluate patients with spinal deformity, especially adolescents with scoliosis in whom a reduced number of radiographic evaluations is desired. The Formetric 4D (Diers International GmbH, Schlangenbad, Germany) is a surface topography system that is able to identify anatomical landmarks and construct a 3-dimentional model of the spine using only surface features. One would guess that a slender patient with easily identifiable bony landmarks would be an ideal patient for this system, and that a patient with a higher Body Mass Index (BMI) would be more difficult to measure [15].

Materials and methods

In this study, fourteen female patients were measured 30 times each to evaluate the reproducibility of the Formetric measurements. The patients ranged in BMI from 16.9 to 29.0, and the reproducibility of each of the Formetric parameters was correlated to BMI.

Results

Results showed that there was not a strong correlation between any of the individual surface topography parameters and the BMI. The reproducibility of the calculated scoliosis curve did correlate with BMI, however, (r = 0.65) and this correlation was significant (p = 0.012), showing that the higher the patient's BMI, the more variability was present in scoliosis angle calculations.

Conclusions

Overall, the reproducibility of the Formetric 4D was very good even in patients with higher BMI. The patient with the highest BMI (29) still had Formetric measurements that were +/- only 4.6 degrees for scoliosis curve calculations.

References

  1. 1.

    Kane WJ: Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop. 1977, Bethesda, MD: NCRP, 126: 43-6. 1987

  2. 2.

    Tan C: Cobb Angle and Scoliosis. Musculoskeletal Consumer Review. 2009

  3. 3.

    Chamberlain CC: Radiation doses to patients undergoing Scoliosis radiography. The British Journal of Radiology. 2002, 73: 847-853.

  4. 4.

    Ovadia D: Radiation-free quantitative assessment of Scoliosis: a Multi-Center prospective study. European Spine Journal. 2006, 16 (1): 97-105.

  5. 5.

    Cole TJ: Weight-stature indices to measure underweight, overweight and obesity. Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status. Edited by: Himes JH. 1991, New York: Wiley-Liss, 83-111.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to P Knott.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knott, P., Mardjetko, S., Tager, D. et al. The influence of body mass index (BMI) on the reproducibility of surface topography measurements. Scoliosis 7, O18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-S1-O18

Download citation

Keywords

  • Body Mass Index
  • Surface Topography
  • High Body Mass Index
  • Spinal Deformity
  • Bony Landmark