Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS) discrepancy between scoliosis children and their parents influence the SRS-22 secore

  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Scoliosis20127 (Suppl 1) :O3

  • Published:


  • Public Health
  • Negative Correlation
  • Health Relate Quality
  • Significant Positive Correlation
  • Relate Quality


The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS) is a valid instrument to assess self perception of trunk deformity [1]. The SRS-22 has been widely used to measure Health Related Quality of Life in scoliosis population but it is not clear which factors can influence its final score [24].


Trunk deformity can be perceived differently by children and parents [5, 6]. The aim of this study was to check whether different perception of the trunk deformity between patients and parents is a factor influencing the SRS-22 or not.

Materials and methods

Prospective study including 71 (62 F, 9 M) patients with idiopathic scoliosis (treated and non treated), attending the clinic with their parents. Mean age 17 y ± 5.7. Mean Cobb angle 37° ± 15°. All patients completed the SRS-22 and the TAPS. Parents completed the TAPS assessing trunk deformity of their children. A coeficient of discrepancy (TAPS-CD) was defined. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS to compare TAPS, TAPS-CD and SRS-22.


Results showed a negative correlation between TPAS-CD and the total SRS-22 (p<.05) and treatment satisfaction (p<.05). A significant positive correlation was found between patients TAPS, self-image and pain and between parents TAPS, function and treatment satisfaction in the SRS-22. Two groups were created according to the SRS-22 score. Patients with higher score in the SRS-22 showed a higher TAPS-CD (P<.05).


Discrepancy in Trunk Deformity Perception between children and parents influence the SRS-22 of the children. Patients’ perception and parents’ perception of trunk deformity influence the SRS-22 differentely.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institut Elena Salvá, Barcelona, Spain


  1. Bagó J, Sánchez-Raya J, Pérez-Grueso FJ Sánchez, Climent JM: The Trink Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): A new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2010, 5: 6-10.1186/1748-7161-5-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B: The influence of spinal and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patient's health-related quality of life questionnaire responses. Spine. 2004, 29: 861-888. 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJ, Izquierdo E: The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine. 2004, 29 (15): 1676-1680. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000132306.53942.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Climent JM, Bagó J, Sánchez J: Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Reseacrh Society -22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine. 2005, 30: 705-709. 10.1097/01.brs.0000155408.76606.8f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rinella A, Lenke L, Peelle M, Edwards C, Bridwell KH, Sides B: Comparison of SRS questionnaire results submitted by both parents and patients in the operative treatment of isiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004, 29 (3): 303-310. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000106489.03355.C5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D, Alman B, Howard A, Stephens D: Parents’ and patients’ perception of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006, 31 (29): 2367-2347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Rigo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.