- Oral presentation
- Open Access
The comparison and validity and reliability study of bilateral innominate vertical length measurements using innovative digital radiographic imaging software in assessing scoliotic leg length discrepancy
© He et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Published: 4 December 2014
- Length Measurement
- Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
- Interobserver Reliability
- Trained Observer
- Intraobserver Reliability
The role of leg length discrepancy (LLD) has been implicated in certain types of scoliosis . Scoliotic LLD has been suggested as a result of rotation of the innominate bones . However, the role of innominate vertical lengths (IVLs) as a predisposing factor for scoliosis is not clear. The reliability of radiographic measurements may reveal whether IVL can be used as a factor for clinical assessment.
Clinical investigation of quantifying bilateral IVLs and to assess the intra- and inter-observer variability using digital radiographic techniques.
Twenty x-ray films from scoliotic patients with LLD were chosen based on convenience, without predilection for gender and age. Images were examined by 7 trained observers to compare bilateral IVLs and to estimate the variability, as well as intra- and inter-observer variations. Each image was measured 3 times at a minimum interval of 1 week. All radiographs were calibrated by the software to allow for accurate length measurements. Student’s t-test was used to compare bilateral IVLs. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used. 95% prediction limits for the errors in measurements to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities. A mean ICC value of 0.93 was determined for interobserver reliability and a mean ICC value of 0.96 for intraobserver reliability.
Overall mean right IVL was 192.6 ± 6.94mm, and left IVL was 190.4 ± 6.95mm. Although there was a discrepancy between bilateral IVLs, there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). Interobserver ICC was 0.954 and intraobserver ICC was 0.974.
Scoliosis patients with LLD might show asymmetrical IVLs; however, this discrepancy has no statistical significance; therefore, IVL is not a strong clinical indicator in assessing scoliotic LLD. On the other hand, the computer-assisted measurements are clinically advantageous and appropriate to assess scoliosis parameters. Digital measurement among different observers showed excellent reliability for the majority of IVL parameters, making it a useful method for the analysis of pathology on radiographs in scoliosis patients.
- Raczkowski JW, Daniszewska B, Zolynski K: Functional scoliosis caused by leg length discrepancy. Arch Med Sci. 2010, 6 (3): 393-398.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friberg O, Nurminen M, Korhonen K, Soininen E, Mänttäri T: Accuracy and precision of clinical estimation of leg length inequality and lumbar scoliosis: Comparison of clinical and radiological measurements. Int Disabil Stud. 1988, 10 (2): 49-53. 10.3109/09638288809164098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.