Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Health-related quality-of-life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 25 years after treatment

  • Ane Simony1Email author,
  • Emil Jesper Hansen1,
  • Leah Y. Carreon1,
  • Steen Bach Christensen1 and
  • Mikkel Osterheden Andersen1
Scoliosis201510:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-015-0045-8

Received: 28 May 2015

Accepted: 3 July 2015

Published: 16 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Since 1962 to the mid eighties the Harrington Rod instrumentation was the Golden standard for surgical treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The Boston braces were introduced in the 1970´s and are still used as a conservative treatment, for curves less than 40°. Very few long-term studies exists, focusing on the health related quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term health related outcome, in a cohort of AIS patients, treated 25 years ago.

Method

219 consecutive patients treated with Boston brace (Brace) or posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using Harrington- DDT instrumentation between 1983 and 1990 at Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, were invited to participate in a long-term evaluation study. A validated Danish version of the Scoliosis Research Society 22R (SRS22R) and Short Form-36 (SF36v1) were administrated to the patients two weeks before the clinical and radiological examination.

Results

159 (72,6 %) patients participated in the clinical follow up and questionnaires, 11 patients participated only in the questionnaires, 8 emigrated, 4 were excluded due to progressive neurological disease and 2 were deceased. The total follow up was 170 patients (83 %), and the average follow up was 24.5 years (22–30 years).

SRS22R domain scores were within the range described as normal for the general population with no statistical difference between the groups except in the Satisfaction domain, where the PSF group had better scores than the braced group.

The SF36 PCS and MCS scores in both AIS cohorts were similar to the scores for the general population.

Conclusion

HRQOLs, as measured by the SRS22R and SF-36, of adult AIS patients treated with Boston brace or PSF during adolescence were similar to the general population. No clinical progression of the deformity has been detected during the 25-year follow up period. The PSF group had a small but statistically significant higher score in the Satisfaction domain compared to the braced group.

Trial registration

S-20110025 Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark.

Keyword

Long-term outcome Health related quality of life Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Harrington-DTT Boston braces

Introduction

Scoliosis is a three dimensional deformity of the spine that affects 1-2 % of the population, mostly females. The most common subgroup is Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) [14]. AIS is often diagnosed during the rapid growth period of the spine, usually from age 11–14 years [3]. Untreated AIS can progress to severe deformation of the spine, with severe pulmonary complication, back pain and reduced health related quality of life [57]. Brace treatment and surgical correction are the most common treatment modalities, and both treatments are well documented to correct the spinal deformity. Both these treatments are performed prophylactically, that is to prevent disease progression and the sequelae that are foreseen to occur two to three decades after the initiation of treatment. However, there are a very few studies with a follow-up longer than 20 years that have been published [812]. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the long-term health related outcome after treatment of AIS patients with either a Boston brace or Harrington-DTT instrumentation at a minimum of 20 years follow up.

Methods

Two hundred nineteen consecutive patients, treated with either a module Boston Braces or posterior spinal fusion with Harrington-DTT instrumentation for AIS at University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen from 1983–1990 were invited to participate. Boston brace treatment was initiated in patients with progression of the deformity, curves larger than 30°, and had remaining growth potential assessed by Risser sign [13, 14] and onset of menarche. Patients were instructed to wear the brace for 23 h a day and were evaluated twice a year by a paediatric orthopaedic surgeon. Bracing was continued until the patient achieved full standing height, was two years post menarcheal or was Risser 5. Patients with curves larger than 50° at the time of referral, or with curve progression despite brace treatment were treated surgically with posterior spinal fusion and Harrington-DTT instrumentation. Surgical patients were placed in serial post-operative casts to ensure a solid spinal fusion. A 10 years follow-up from the same patient population, has previously been published by Andersen et al. in 2006 [15].

The patients were invited to participate in a clinical and radiological examination, including health related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires. The original medical charts from first visit to termination of treatment angles were available including Cobb angel measurements, curve types and end vertebrae recorded at every visit. All radiographic evaluations were performed by the authors MA and SBC. The original radiographs were no longer available. After obtaining a written consent, patients were invited to a clinical examination and full-length 36-inch posteroanterior and lateral standing radiographs were taken. A Danish version of Short Form-36 (SF-36) [16], Scoliosis Research Society Instrument-22R (SRS-22R) [17] and EuroQOL-5D (EQ5D) [18] was also administered.

All statistical analyses were carried out using PASW V.17.0 (IMB, Somes, NY). Comparisons between the braced and the surgical group were performed using unpaired t-tests for normally distributed continuous variables, Wilcoxon signed rank test for continuous variables that were not normally distributed and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

Results

Of the 219 patients who met inclusion criteria, 159 (73 %) participated in the clinical and radiological follow up. Eleven (5 %) completed HRQOL surveys but did not consent to the clinical and radiological examination. Thirty-three patients did not respond to the follow up invitation, 8 emigrated and were not available for follow up, 4 were excluded due to progressive neurological disease and 2 were deceased.

The total follow up was 170 patients (83 %), 73 of whom were braced and 97 treated with surgery. The average age at follow up was 41.4 years (range, 34 – 47) in the braced group and 37.6 (range, 33–47) in the surgery group. The average length of follow up was 26.5 years (range, 22–31 years) in the braced group and 24.5 years (range, 22–30 years) in the surgery group (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of patients

 

Boston brace

Harrington rod instrumentation

Total

N

73

97

170

Female

62

85

147

Age at end of treatment (years)

15.8 (14–19)

14.3 (12–18)

 

Age at follow-up (years)

41.4 (34–47)

37.6 (33–47)

 
Although all the SRS22-R domain scores were within the range described as normal for the general population [19], the scores were equal between the surgery group, compared to the braced group. Only in the Satisfaction with management domain, there was a statistical significance between the 2 groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Summary of outcome scores

Outcome Measure

Boston brace

Harrington rod instrumentation

p-value

Scoliosis Research Society – 22R

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

 

 Function

4.21 (0.82)

4.30 (0.83)

0.281

 Pain

3.73 (0.95)

3.86 (0.97)

0.262

 Self-Image

3.60 (0.94)

3.83 (0.82)

0.161

 Mental

3.99 (0.74)

4.07 (0.77)

0.442

 Satisfaction

3.46 (0.91)

4.33 (0.76)

0.000

Short Form - 36

   

 Physical Composite Summary

47.87 (10.26)

47.54 (11.20)

0.780

 Mental Composite Summary

50.38 (11.32)

53.07 (9.24)

0.070

EuroQOL 5D

   

 Score

0.82 (0.15)

0.85 (0.16)

0.213

The SF36 PCS and MCS scores in both AIS cohorts were similar to the scores for the Danish age-matched general population, published by Bjoerner [20], with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Similarly, there was no difference in the EQ-5D scores between the braced and surgery groups.

In the surgery group, 4 had revision surgery due to proximal implant failures and 3 due to broken rods before solid fusion was achieved; 3 patients had rod fractures within the first year after surgery, but the correction was maintained and there was no soft tissue irritation, so the rod was left in place; 3 patients complained of postoperative thoracic pain which resolved within the first postoperative year; and two patients developed pneumo thorax during resection of their rib deformity. There were no deep wound infections and no neurologic complications.

Discussion

Few studies have been published on the long-term outcome in AIS patients, focusing on the health related quality of life. Although studies reporting the quality of life in patients treated surgically for scoliosis have been available, [4, 812, 21, 22] these studies were largely limited by small sample size and the inclusion of congenital and neuromuscular scoliosis patients;[21] by the lack of a generic measure of quality of life [8, 9], or by the lack of surgical treatment of patients in the cohort [4].

In the current study, HRQOL as measured by SF36 MCS and PCS in the AIS patients were similar to normal age-matched Danish normal data [20], regardless the treatment the patients had received. These findings are similar to the study by Danielsson [11] and Gotze [23], looking at long term health related quality of life measures in AIS patients treated with Harrington-DTT instrumentation. Danielsson [11] evaluated AIS patients treated with surgery with at least 20 year follow-up and reported that in their surgical cohort with a mean age of 39.7 years, the mean SF-36 PCS score was 50.9 and the mean SF-36 MCS score was 50.2. In a recent study looking at AIS patients who had Harrington-DTT instrumentation, patients at a mean age of 32.3 years had a mean score of 50.9 for both the SF-36 PCS and MCS [23]. Neither of these studies used the disease specific SRS-22R as an outcome measure.

Disease specific outcomes evaluated by the SRS 22R domain scores were similar to the normal age-matched scores [19] and showed no statistically significant difference between the braced and the surgery group, except in the Satisfaction with management scores. In an earlier study on the same cohort of patients, ten years after the end of treatment, Andersen reported that the daily 23 h brace treatment significantly decreased the patient’s daily activities, and that the brace treated patients experienced more back pain than the surgical treated patients [15]. Brace related questions revealed a negative impact on the patients Activity of Daily Living, participation in Sport, and some kept their brace treatment as a secret to friends. This negative impact of brace wear [24, 25] may help explain the difference in the Satisfaction with treatment domain, in these patients.

Spinal deformity correction is performed to prevent impaired pulmonary function and spine related disability later in life [6, 7]. Thus, longer term studies, when patients are in their fifth and sixth decade, are needed to determine whether these patients will have similar quality of life outcomes, pulmonary function and spine related problems as the general population.

Conclusion

Health related quality of life, as measured by the SRS22R and SF-36, of adult AIS patients treated with Boston brace or surgery during adolescence were similar to the general population. No clinical progression of the deformity has been detected during the 25-year follow up period.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by The Danish Association for Rheumatic Diseases, Bevica Foundation and Aase and Einar Danielssons Foundation. We want to acknowledge Thomas Kjaer and the staff at CFR Hospitals, for their contribution to this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sector for Spine Surgery & Research, Middelfart Hospital Denmark

References

  1. Andersen MO, Kyvik K, Thomsen K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in twins, a population based survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(16):1571–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kouwenhoven JW, Castelein RM. The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature. Spine. 2008;33:2898–908.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lonstein JE, Bjorklund S, Wanninger MH, Nelson RP. Voluntary school screening for scoliosis in Minnesota. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(4):481–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008;371(9623):1527–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Danielsson AJ. Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a tool for guidance in decision of surgery of curves above 50°. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(1):37–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjure J, Grimby G, Kasalický J, Lindh M, Nachemson A. Respiratory impairment and airway closure in patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis. Thorax. 1970;25(4):451–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Haefeli M, Elfering A, Kilian R, Min K, Boos N. Nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 10- to 60-year follow-up with special reference to health-related quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(3):355–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Akazawa T, Minami S, Kotani T, Nemoto T, Koshi T, Takahashi K. Health-Related Quality of Life and Low Back Pain of Patients Surgically Treated for Scoliosis after 21 Years or More of Follow-Up: Comparison among Non-Idiopathic Scoliosis, Idiopathic Scoliosis, and Healthy Subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Akazawa T, Minami S, Kotani T, Nemoto T, Koshi T, Takahashi K. Long-term clinical outcomes of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 21 to 41 years later. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(5):402–5. PubMed.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Back Pain and Function 22 Years After Brace Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case–control Study—Part I. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(18):2078–85. discussion 2086.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Back pain and function 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case–control study-part II. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(18):E373–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pehrsson K, Bake B, Larsson S, Nachemson A. Lung Function in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 20 year follow up. Thorax. 1991;46:474.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Reem J, Carney J, Stanley M, Cassidy J. Risser sign inter-rater and intra-rater agreement: is the Risser sign reliable? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:371–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Risser JC. The iliac apophysis; an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop. 1958;11:111–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Andersen MO, Christensen SB, Thomsen K. Outcome 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(3):350–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bjorner JB, Thunedborg K, Kristensen JS, Modvig J, Bech P. The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: Translation and Preliminary Validity Studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):991–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Simony A. Reliability and validity testing of a Danish translated version of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument-22Revised (SRS 22R), Accepted for publication in Journal of Spinal Deformity 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Sorensen J, Davidsen M, Gudex C, Pedersen KM. Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37(5):467–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Baldus C, Bridwell KH, Harrast J, Edwards 2nd C, Glassman S, Horton W, et al. Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2214–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Bech P, Rasmussen NK, Modvig J, et al. Dansk manual til SF-36. Lægemiddelindustri-foreningen: Lif, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Takayama K, Nakamura H, Matsuda H. Quality of life in patients treated surgically for scoliosis: longer than sixteen-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2179–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Westrick ER, Ward WT. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year to 20-year evidence-based surgical results. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(1 Suppl):S61–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Götze C, Liljenqvist UR, Slomka A, Götze HG, Steinbeck J. Quality of life and back pain: outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa1976). 2002;27(13):1456–63. discussion 1463–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. MacLean WE, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC. Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9:257–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wicker FC, Bunch WH, Barnett PM. Psychological factors in failure to wear the Milwaukee brace for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop. 1977;126:62–6.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Simony et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement