Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts on neurological and muscular etiologies

  • Marcelo Wajchenberg1, 3Email author,
  • Nelson Astur2, 3,
  • Michel Kanas1, 3 and
  • Délio Eulálio Martins1, 3
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders201611:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0066-y

Received: 25 August 2015

Accepted: 10 January 2016

Published: 27 June 2016

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a frequent disease but its etiology remains unknown. Gender prevalence in females is already known and there are many suggested hypotheses to explain its origin and manifestation, like associated neurologic, muscular and connective tissue disorders. Literature reports have tried to analyze disease prevalence in selected populations, possible ways of inheritance, related genes location and their polymorphisms, which may play a role in the development of the deformity. The purpose of this paper is to review and update concepts on the origin and genetic influence on AIS.

Keywords

Genetics Scoliosis/etiology Adolescent

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is defined as a lateral deviation of the spine, associated to rotation of the vertebrae in an otherwise healthy subject, without any known cause for the deformity. These subjects have no neurological, muscular disturbance or any other diseases [1]. Radiographic imaging studies show no vertebral abnormalities but a spinal curve of greater than 10° is detected and measured through Cobb method [2]. The scoliotic curve progresses during spinal growth, and is classified under three categories, according to their age of appearance, such as infantile before three years of age, juvenile between three and ten years of age (or at the beginning of puberty) and, adolescent when detected after the age of 10 or after puberty [3, 4].

Research work on twins have been performed since 1875 to observe the influence of genetic and external factors on the manifestation of certain diseases [5]. Fisher and George [6] studied pairs of monozygotic and dizygotic twins with idiopathic scoliosis, assessing the similarity of spinal deformities and observed that environmental aspects were able to modify the features and severity of the disease, especially among dizygotic twins. Kesling and Reinker [7] reported, in a systematic review, concordance rate of 73 % in 37 pairs of monozygotic twins and 36 % in 31 pairs of dizygotic twins, demonstrating greater similarity between monozygotic twins. Recently, Del Curto et al. [8] reported a pair of monozygotic twins with AIS, but with curves that diverged on type, side and, severity, suggesting that this fact would occur due to the influence of the environment or action of epigenetic factors.

The epigenetic factors are unrelated to the primary DNA sequence. Otherwise, three main mechanisms related to these changes exist: DNA methylation, modification of histones and non-coding small RNAs to modify the expression of specific genes where there is therapeutic potential [9]. Epigenetic modifications provide multicellular organisms with a system of normal gene regulation that silences portions of the genome and keeps them silent as tissues differentiate as epigenotypes: errors in this complex system from environmental and stochastic events termed epimutations can give rise to abnormal gene silencing, which may result in phenotypic variation and common disease [9, 10].

Review

Prevalence and genetic inheritance

In 1968, Wynne-Davies [3] conducted a study in 114 patients with idiopathic scoliosis to evaluate the familial incidence of this disease and compare it to the general population, trying to find some evidence of inheritance of the disease. In this study, they observed that 6.9 % of first-grade relatives, 3.7 % of second-grade relatives and 1.6 % of third-grade relatives were affected. With these results, they concluded that there is strong evidence of existent relationship of genetic factors with idiopathic scoliosis, along with suggestive features of dominant or polygenic inheritance.

Cowell et al. [11] studied 110 families in which 80 % of patients had AIS with other affected relatives and suggested that the appearance of isolated cases of idiopathic scoliosis is related to sporadic forms from new mutations. These authors also found high prevalence (33 %) of families affected compared to their control group from the general population (5.6 %). Czeizel et al. [12] studied 116 Hungarian families, and observed occurrence of AIS in 0.083 (±0.0037) of first-grade relatives, 0.02 (±0.0017) of second-grade relatives and 0.0084 (±0.0007) of third-grade relatives. Martin et al. [13] observed in a Spanish population that 25 % of patients had one or more relatives affected with idiopathic scoliosis in their families, and the prevalence among first-grade relatives was 5.2 % and 4.3 % in second-grade relatives. These numbers were similar to those found by Wajchenberg et al. [14] who studied the genealogy of 100 Brazilian families who had at least one individual with AIS with curves greater than or equal to 20°.

The prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in radiographic studies, in a scholar population, ranged from 0.3 % to 15.3 %, but when curves greater than ten degrees were considered, rates dropped to values between 1.5 % and 3 %. For curves larger than 20°, prevalence was between 0.3 % and 0.5 %, and for those higher than 30°, rate was between 0.2 % and 0.3 % [4] (Table 1). The inheritance pattern for the transmission of AIS is not fully known. Multifactorial inheritance have been suggested [10], autosomal dominant [1, 3, 4, 1517] and X-linked [11, 13, 18].
Table 1

Prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis [4]

Prevalence of AIS

0.3–15.3 %

Curve > 10°

1.5–3.0 %

Curve > 20°

0.3–0.5 %

Curve > 30°

0.2–0.3 %

AIS Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

In the literature, there are several reports that AIS affects girls predominantly and that these patients have a different pattern of growth compared to unaffected girls [1921]. When we define affected subjects as those individuals with curves higher than 15° Cobb, it has been noted that 0.3 % of boys and 1.8 % of girls between 13 and 14 years have the disease in Japan [22]. Growth and sexual maturity in girls is influenced by hereditary factors related to polymorphism of genes associated with age at menarche and stature. [23, 24].

Etiology

The etiology of AIS remains unknown. In 1882, Adams [25] did not believe in the existence of fixed curves in the lateral deviation of the spine, suggesting that there would be primarily muscle weakness with a permissive condition of the ligaments. Currently, different factors have been suggested, as the standard deviation of growth, neuromuscular or connective tissue changes, the asymmetrical limbs and trunk growth, changes in sagittal configuration of the spine and factors related to the environment [4, 6, 7].

In 1977, Burwell & Dangerfield [26] suggested that there is some relation between the side of convexity of a thoracic scoliosis, the side of the longer upper limb, and handedness. Haderspeck & Schulz [27] have shown that imbalance of lateral bending muscle forces may increase existing scoliotic curves and it is possible that greater muscle development on the side of the dominant limb influences spinal posture in adolescents.

In 1983, Dubousset et al. [28] observed the development of scoliosis in chickens undergoing resection of the pineal gland, giving the deformity to decreased production of melatonin. This research led Dubousset et al. [29] to compare rates of melatonin to a control group, whereby they noted that scoliotic patients had 35 % lower rates overnight. However, there is still no satisfactory explanation of this observation with the evolution of the disease. It has also been observed in another study that the pinealectomyzed chickens that developed scoliosis, had increased sensitive somatosensory evoked potential latency, suggesting that the lesion would affect the sensory conduction at the ceiling of the third ventricle [30].

Anatomical alterations of neural tissue, observed by MRI, were also attached to the etiology of idiopathic scoliosis. The presence of syringomyelia in the cervicothoracic region, associated with a type I Chiari malformation, in the foramen magnum had a higher prevalence in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. In 1998, Freitas et al. [31] reported that 14.5 % of the patients in a Brazilian population had this associated finding [31], while Gupta et al. [32] in the same year, through literature review, found this type of variations between 17 and 47 % [32]. Studies show that patients generally have no neurological disorders, detecting in some patients, abdominal reflex asymmetry [33]. However, up to date it is unknown whether this finding is a cause or consequence of the deformity.

Royo-Salvador et al. [34] proposed that spinal cord traction caused by a tight filum terminale may be considered as a pathogenic mechanism involved in the development of syringomyelia, Chiari malformation (Type 1) and scoliosis. These authors performed ressection of the filum terminale through a standard sacrectomy in 20 non-consecutive patients with scoliosis (n = 8), syringomielia (n = 5), Chiari malformation (n = 2) and a combination of all three conditions (n = 5). All patients were neurological symptomatic. Improvement of the scoliotic curves was observed in all patients with scoliosis except in one. In this paper the authors do not reveal the etiology of scoliosis.

Relative anterior spinal overgrowth with uncoupled neuro-osseous growth was also found in AIS girls. The observations are closely related to bone and energetic metabolism. Burwell et al. [35] have suggested the possible role of leptin dysfunction in abnormal asymmetric growth that leads to spinal deformity. The effect of leptin and soluble leptin receptor (sOB-R) on bone and energetic metabolism matches the phenotypic expression of the AIS girls. In 2012, Liu et al. [36] observed that the sOB-R level in AIS girls was significantly higher than that of healthy control girls in the absence of difference in free serum leptin level.

Some authors have suggested that AIS could be due to lesion in the anterior horn of the spinal cord or in the brain stem since type grouping was detected examining spinal muscles [37, 38]. In 1998, Chagas et al. [39] reported that the neurogenic pattern is the main manifestation found in the rotator muscles of the back of 32 female patients, biopsied during AIS correction surgery and sent to histochemical study analysis. These authors suggested the presence of a smooth form of type III spinal muscular atrophy [39]. In 2015, in a similar study, Wajchenberg et al. [40] found peri and endomysial fibrosis, fatty proliferation between muscle fibers and signs of “Central Core”, both at the concavity and the convexity of the curve, suggesting that the AIS is a congenital myopathy.

Genetic research

Since 2000, studies of genetic link in families with multiple affected members suggested possible chromosomal regions related to the etiology of AIS (Table 2). Using this technique, Wise et al. [14] in 2000, described the first regions related to AIS, on chromosomes 6p, 10q and 18q, after studying a large family with seven members affected by this disease. In the following years, other family studies have suggested that adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were related to chromosomes 6, 9, 16 and 17 [41], 17p11 [42], 19p13.37 [43], 8q12 [44], 9q31-q34.2 and 17q25.3-qtel [1], 12p23 [45] and 18q12.1-12.2 [46]. Wajchenberg et al. [47] found no connection when studied a Brazilian family with multiple affected members.
Table 2

Genetic research that suggested possible chromosomal regions related to the etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Wise et al., 2000 [16]

6p, 10q, 18q

Chan et al., 2002 [43]

19p13.37

Miller et al., 2005 [41]

6, 9, 16, 17

Gao et al., 2007 [44]

8q12

Ocaka et al., 2008 [1]

9q31-q34.2, 17q25.3-qtel

Raggio et al., 2009 [45]

12p23

Gurnett et al., 2009 [46]

18q12.1-12.2

Clough et al., 2010 [42]

17p11

Takahashi et al., 2011 [50]

10q24.31

Kou et al., 2013 [53]

6q24.1

Zhu et al., 2015 [54]

1p36.32, 2q36.1, 18q21.33, 10q24.32

Due to the higher prevalence of AIS in girls, studies were conducted to analyze the sex chromosome X. In 2002 Inoue et al. [48] reported that the polymorphism of estrogen receptor gene is associated with the severity of the deformity. Justice et al. used independent analysis model with 15 markers for the X chromosome in 202 families, finding association in the regions Xq23 and Xq26.1 [18]. Wu et al. [49], investigated the association of the polymorphism of estrogen receptor gene and they concluded that the AIS is associated to XbaI gene, however Takahashi et al. [50] in 2011 reported no relationship between the two regions at the chromosome X, related to the estrogen receptor genes, with the manifestation and severity of AIS, after performing an extensive study in the Japanese population.

Also in 2011, Takahashi et al. [51] in a multicenter study conducted in the Japanese population with 1050 women with AIS and 1474 controls, using the genome wide association study (GWAS) technique, associated the loci 10q24.31 to the disease. This region contains the LBX1 gene, which is expressed in the dorsal region of the spinal cord, skeletal muscle and influence somatosensitive neuronal activity. Family studies to search for genes responsible for AIS can help us to understand the origin of the disease, but have an important limitation to separate affected individuals to those not affected because there is variability in the measurement of the curves using Cobb’s method and even in clinical evaluation [52].

In 2013, Kou at al. [53] extended the Takahashi et al. [51] study. Not only did this extension confirmed the relationship of 10q24.31 with AIS but it also identified a new correlated DNA region, region 6q24.1, and related a Han Chinese population to another population of European ancestry. The authors also reported a relationship between the disease and GPR 126 gene within the same region studied. According to the authors, neither the expression of this gene in the skeletal tissue of humans nor its relationship to scoliosis has been explored. Thus, they attempted to study its expression in various tissues, such as bone, cartilage, intervertebral disks, and they found high expression in cartilage.

Recently, Zhu et al. [54] conducted a research in a Chinese Han population using GWAS and identified three new susceptibility loci of AIS at 1p36.32, 2q36.1 and 18q21.33. The authors also refined a region previously associated with AIS at 10q24.32, suggesting that LBX1AX1, an antisense transcript of LBX1, might be the functional variant of AIS [54].

Thus, another alternative for genetic studies is the use of molecular markers, previously selected and with a known location in the human genome such as SNPs or snips, which are “silent” chromosomal regions, easily located, without phenotypic manifestation and that show variability of heterozygous alleles. Authors like Aulisa et al. [55], Quiu et al. [56], Chen et al. [57] and Wajchenberg et al. [58], carried out studies of genetic polymorphisms trying to relate AIS with changes in certain genes.

Current statistics show that AIS is responsible for 90 % of cases of idiopathic scoliosis, reaching more than 2 % of the pediatric population, providing more than 600,000 medical visits per year [59]. Due to these numbers studies were further conducted, using a microarray technique, in long series of patients with AIS, enabling the discovery of several markers of polymorphism in chromosome regions related not only to the disease but also to its progression, through a 1 to 200 scale [59]. However, this method has high cost, was developed only for the Caucasian population with no validation for African and Asian populations and needs further confirmation in the literature.

We, like Cheng et al. [60] believe in the need for more cross-disciplinary and multicenter research collaboration to enable pooling of clinical cases to facilitate cross-ethnic studies with sufficient numbers of patients to better define phenotypes and endophenotypes. This approach would also enable better complementary use of expertise and emerging innovative technologies and, along with wiser use of advances in other fields, could lead to improvements in research methodology and in understanding disease trajectory [60].

Conclusion

AIS is a complex disease and, for the most part, complex diseases are caused by a combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, most of which have not yet been identified [61]. Despite all studies and technology, we still can not fully describe their way of inheritance and which are the responsible genes. Family studies may assist to understand the disease, but the great challenge is to label which individuals are affected since there is great variability in the presentation, being doubtful to consider who is an affected individual just by measuring the deformity by the Cobb method. One should also consider that certain groups are more susceptible, such as females and Caucasians. This is probably a polygenic disease and influenced by genes responsible for the synthesis of proteins important for the composition of human tissues, which act in supporting the spine. Thus, it becomes important to study the polymorphism of these genes and their expression in tissues, also considering the influence of the environment.

Abbreviations

AIS: 

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

GWAS: 

Genome wide association study

sOB-R: 

Soluble leptin receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

There are none. No funding declared.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo/UNIFESP
(2)
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo
(3)
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

References

  1. Ocaka L, Zhao C, Reed JA, Ebenezer ND, Brice G, Morley T, et al. Assignment of two loci for autosomal dominant adolescent idiopathic scoliosis to chromosomes 9q31.2-q34.2 and 17q25.3-qtel. J Med Genet. 2008;45(2):87–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Instructional Course Lectures. 1948;5:261–5.Google Scholar
  3. Wynne-Davies R. Familial (idiopathic) scoliosis. A family survey. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1968;50(1):24–30.Google Scholar
  4. Lonstein JE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 1994;344(8934):1407–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Galton F. The history of twins as a criterion of the relative posers of a nature and nuture. Pop Sci Monthly. 1875;8:345.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher RL, George FV. A twin study of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967;55:117–26.Google Scholar
  7. Kesling KL, Reinker KA. Scoliosis in twins. A meta-analysis of the literature and report of six cases. Spine. 1997;22(17):2009–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Curto D, Ueta RHS, Wajchenberg M, Martins Filho DE, Puertas EB. Variações na apresentação fenotípica da escoliose idiopática do adolescente. Coluna. 2010;9(1):19–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, Moulton A. Genetics, epigenetics and the scoliogeny of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much is genetics and how much is it epigenetics as a new paradigm? Bone & Joint. 2014;9:43-48 .Google Scholar
  10. Burwell RG, Dangerfield PD, Moulton A, Grivas TB. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), environment, exposome and epigenetics: a molecular perspective of postnatal normal spinal growth and the etiopathogenesis of AIS with consideration of a network approach and possible implications for medical therapy. Scoliosis. 2011;6:26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowell HR, Hall JN, MacEwen GD. Genetic aspects of idiopathic scoliosis. A Nicholas Andry Award essay, 1970. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;86:121–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Czeizel A, Bellyei A, Barta O, Magda T, Molnár L. Genetics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Med Genet. 1978;15(6):424–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Martín Martín J, Rodríguez Blanco C, Eguren Hernández EM, Díaz Polegre R, de León García F, Pedrosa Guerra AI. Family prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis. An Esp Pediatr. 1997;46(2):148–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wajchenberg M, Puertas EB, Zatz M. Estudo da prevalência da escoliose idiopática do adolescente em pacientes brasileiros. Coluna. 2005;4(3):127–31.Google Scholar
  15. Alden KJ, Marosy B, Nzegwu N, Justice CM, Wilson AF, Miller NH. Idiopathic scoliosis: identification of candidate regions on chromosome 19p13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(16):1815–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wise CA, Barnes R, Gillum J, Herring JA, Bowcock AM, Lovett M. Localization of susceptibility to familial idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2000;25(18):2372–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Salehi LB, Mangino M, De Serio S, De Cicco D, Capon F, Semprini S, et al. Assignment of a locus for autosomal dominant idiopathic scoliosis (IS) to human chromosome 17p11. Hum Genet. 2002;111(4–5):401–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Justice CM, Miller NH, Marosy B, Zhang J, Wilson AF. Familial idiopathic scoliosis: evidence of an X-linked susceptibility locus. Spine. 2003;28(6):589–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilner S. Growth and height of the children with scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1975;46:71–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Drummond DS, Rogala EJ. Growth and maturation of adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1980;5:507–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Siu KCC, Tak KLW, Kit TY, et al. Abnormal peripubertal anthropometric measurements and growth pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A study of 598 patients. Spine. 2003;28:2152–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohtsuka Y, Yamagata M, Arai S, et al. School screening for scoliosis by the Chiba University Medical School screening program. Results of 1.24 milion students over an 8-year period. Spine. 1988;13:1251–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Suarez F, Rossigol C, Garabedian M. Interactive effect of estradiol and vitamin D receptor gene polymorphismis as a possible determinant of growth in male and female infants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:3563–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stavrou I, Zois C, Ioannidis JP, et al. Association of polymorphisms of the estrogen receptor alpha gene with the age of menarche. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1101–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Adams W. Lateral curvature of the spine, external characters and morbid anatomy (Lecture 4). Lectures on the pathology and treatment of lateral and other forms of curvature of the spine. London: Churchill; 1882.Google Scholar
  26. Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH. Anthropometry and scoliosis. In: Scoliosis: 5th symposium (Ed. Zorab, P. A,). London: Academic; 1977. p. 123–64.Google Scholar
  27. Haderspeck K, Schultz AB. Progression of idiopathic scoliosis: an analysis of muscle actions and body weight influences. Spine. 1981;6:447–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dubousset J, Queneau P, Thillard MJ. Experimental scoliosis induced by pineal and diencephalic lesions in young chikens. Its relation with clinical findings in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Trans. 1983;7:7.Google Scholar
  29. Dubousset J, Melatonin MM. A possible role in the pathogenesis of human idiopathic scoliosis. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Philip Zorad Symposium on Scoliosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. abstract 3.19.Google Scholar
  30. Machida M, Dubousset J, Imamura Y, Iwaya T, Yamada T, Kimura J. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: SEPs in chicken with experimentally induced scoliosis and in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediat Orthop. 1994;14:329–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Freitas AA, Puertas EB, Chagas JCM. Estudo da ressonância nuclear magnética mostrando a presença de siringomielia em pacientes portadores de escoliose considerada idiopática. Acta Ortop Bras. 1998;6(3):102–8.Google Scholar
  32. Gupta P, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Incidence of neural axis abnormalities in infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity. Is a magnetic resonance image screening necessary? Spine. 1998;23:206–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zadeh HG, Sakka SA, Powell MP, Mehta MH. Absence superficial abdominal reflexes in children with scoliosis. An earlier indicator of syringomyelia. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1995;77-B(5):762–67.Google Scholar
  34. Royo-Salvador MB, Solé-Llenas J, Doménech JM, González-Adrio R. Results of the section of the filum terminale in 20 patients with syringomyelia, scoliosis and Chiari malformation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147:515–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, Moulton A, et al. Etiologic theories of idiopathic scoliosis: autonomic nervous system and the leptin-sympathetic nervous system concept for the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;140:197–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu Z, Tam EMS, Sun GQ, Lam TP, Zhu ZZ, Sun X, et al. Abnormal Leptin Bioavailability in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 2012;37(7):599–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Slager UT, Hsu JD. Morphometry and pathology of the paraspinous muscles in idiopathic scoliosis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1956;28:749–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Spencer GSG, Zorab PA. Spinal muscle in scoliosis. Part 1: histology and histochemistry. J Neurol Sci. 1976;30:137–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Chagas JCM, Schmidt B, Puertas EB, Oliveira CEAS, Freitas AA. Estudo histoquímico dos músculos rotadores do dorso em pacientes com escoliose idiopática do adolescente.Google Scholar
  40. Wajchenberg M, Martins DE, Luciano RP, Puertas EB, Curto DD, Schmidt B, et al. Histochemical analysis of paraspinal rotator muscles from patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medicine. 2015;94(8):e598.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller NH, Justice CM, Marosy B, Doheny KF, Pugh E, Zhang J, et al. Identification of candidate regions for familial idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(10):1181–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Clough M, Justice CM, Marosy B, Miller NH. Males with familial idiopathic scoliosis: a distinct phenotypic subgroup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):162–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Chan V, Fong GC, Luk KD, Yip B, Lee MK, Wong MS, et al. A genetic locus for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis linked to chromosome 19p13.3. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(2):401–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Gao X, Gordon D, Zhang D, Browne R, Helms C, Gillum J, et al. CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80(5):957–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Raggio CL, Giampietro PF, Dobrin S, Zhao C, Dorshorst D, Ghebranious N, et al. A novel locus for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on chromosome 12p. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(10):1366–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Gurnett CA, Alaee F, Bowcock A, Kruse L, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Genetic linkage localizes an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and pectus excavatum gene to chromosome 18 q. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):E94–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Wajchenberg M, Lazar M, Cavaçana N, Martins DE, Licinio L, Puertas EB, et al. Genetic aspects of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a family with multiple affected members: a research article. Scoliosis. 2010;5:7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Inoue M, Minami S, Nakata Y, et al. Association between estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms and curve severity of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27:2357–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu J, Qiu Y, Zhang L, Sun Q, Qiu X, He Y. Association of estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31(10):1131–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Takahashi V, Matsumoto M, Karasugi T, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Kawakami N, et al. Replication study of the association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and two estrogen receptor genes. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:834–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Takahashi Y, Kou I, Takahashi A, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies common variants near LBX1 associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1237–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wajchenberg M, Martins DE, Lazar M. What is the best way to determine the cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(4):48.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Kou I, Takahasi Y, Johnson TA, et al. Genetic variants in GPR 126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45:676–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhu Z, Tang NL, Xu L, Quin X, Mao S, Song Y, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese girls. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8355.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Aulisa L, Papaleo P, Pola E, Angelini F, Aulisa AG, Tamburrelli FC, et al. Association between IL-6 and MMP-3 gene polymorphisms and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case control study. Spine. 2007;32(24):2700–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Qiu XS, Tang NL, Yeung HY, Qiu Y, Cheng JC. Association study between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the DPP9 gene which is located in the candidate region identified by linkage analysis. Postgrad Med J. 2008;84(995):498–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Chen Z, Tang NL, Cao X, Qiao D, Yi L, Cheng JC, et al. Promoter polymorphism of matrilin- 1 gene predisposes to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a Chinese population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17(4):525–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wajchenberg M, Luciano RP, Arajo RC, Martins DE, Puertas EB, Almeida SS. Polymorphism of the ACE gene and the alfa-actinin-3 gene in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Ortop Bras. 2013;21(3):170–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Ogilvie J. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and genetic testing. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22(1):67–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Cheng JC, Castelein RM, Chu WC, Danielsson AJ, Dobbs MB, Grivas TB, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Rev. 2015;1:1–20.Google Scholar
  61. Craig J. Complex diseases: research and applications. Nature Education. 2008;1(1):184.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Wajchenberg et al. 2016

Advertisement