Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An exploration of information exchange by adolescents and parents participating in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis online support groups

  • Traci Schwieger1Email author,
  • Shelly Campo2,
  • Keli R. Steuber3,
  • Stuart L. Weinstein4 and
  • Sato Ashida2
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders201611:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0084-9

Received: 13 January 2016

Accepted: 1 August 2016

Published: 11 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Research indicates that healthcare providers frequently fail to adequately address patients’ health information needs. Therefore, it is not surprising that patients or parents of a sick child are seeking health information on the internet, in particular in online support groups (OSGs). In order to improve our understanding of the unmet health information needs of families dealing with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), this study assessed and compared the types of information that adolescents and parents are seeking in OSGs.

Methods

This study used two publicly accessible AIS-related OSGs on the National Scoliosis Foundation (NSF) website that targeted those who are receiving brace treatment and those under observation without treatment. Information exchanges were coded as providing or seeking information. Types of information being exchanged were categorized into several AIS-specific and brace-specific categories. Through a review of over 8,000 messages, 305 adolescents with AIS and 300 parents of a child with AIS were identified and categorized based on stage of illness/treatment. One message from each individual was randomly selected and coded for analysis.

Results

There were significantly more (p < 0.001) parents that had a recently diagnosed child compared to recently diagnosed adolescents participating in the AIS-related OSGs, whereas there were significantly more (p = 0.004) adolescents that experienced brace treatment compared to parents of a child that experienced brace treatment. The most frequent information exchanged by adolescents and parents was AIS-related concerns regarding causes, diagnosis, and progression of the condition. However, compared to adolescents, parents exchanged this AIS-related information significantly more (p < .001) in their posts. Finally, compared to parents, adolescents exchanged significantly more information about appearance-related concerns regarding both AIS-related deformity (p < 0.002) and wearing a brace (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Families dealing with AIS are participating in OSGs to exchange information, in particular information related to the condition and to treatment. This study found similarities and differences regarding how information was exchanged (providing or seeking) and regarding frequency and types of information exchanged. Knowledge of these similarities and differences may be useful for improving health communication in the healthcare setting, at home, and for development and improvement of AIS-related website support.

Keywords

Scoliosis Brace Spine Deformity Internet Support groups Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Online

Background

Failure to fully address patients’ and families’ health information needs in the healthcare setting has frequently been found in the literature regarding a variety of illnesses [15]. Therefore, many patients are seeking additional health information outside of the hospital setting, in particular on the internet. For many, participation in online support groups (OSGs) can be a source of illness-related information and social support that may help to provide a sense of empowerment through increased acceptance, confidence, optimism, and enhanced social well-being [69]. Ultimately, the information and support provided by OSGs may impact several aspects of the patient’s illness including, coping with the illness, medical decision-making, behavior changes, preventative behaviors, and expectations.

Research indicates that parents of a child with chronic illnesses are seeking health information in OSGs [10, 11]. Unfortunately, little is known about the use of the internet to obtain health information for adolescents with chronic illnesses and whether the use of the internet as a source for health information differs between adolescents and their parents. One such chronic condition impacting both parents and adolescents is adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Because treatment for AIS includes self-care behaviors, such as wearing a brace and restricting activities, differences in health information acquired (regardless of quality) on the internet by adolescents and parents may result in different understandings, concerns, and expectations regarding the condition and treatments. Ultimately, these differences could result in stress and conflicts in the healthcare setting and at home regarding medical treatment decisions and adherence to treatment recommendations. Therefore, the current study assessed the type of information exchanged by adolescents and parents affected by AIS that are participating in OSGs, including whether the information exchanged was similar or different.

Methods

The OSGs that were explored in this study were on the non-profit National Scoliosis Foundation (NSF) website where there are more than 8,000 members participating in many different AIS-related forums. This study was part of a larger research project assessing adolescent uncertainty surrounding AIS treatment (observation versus brace treatment), therefore two adolescent NSF forums, “Watching and Waiting” and “Bracing” were analyzed. However, despite the fact that the forums targeted adolescents undergoing observation or brace treatment, many participants were active in both forums simultaneously, discussed both observation and brace treatment, and many were parents of a child with AIS. Therefore, the authors analyzed the type of information exchanged by adolescents compared to parents instead of observation compared to brace treatment. Only posts that were available to the public were analyzed. The first author’s institutional review board (IRB) determined this study to be non-human subjects research.

Participants

Preliminary analysis of more than 8,000 posts was conducted to identify gender, age group (adolescent or parent of a child with AIS), stage of illness/treatment, and topics relevant to the participants. After reviewing all the posts in the two NSF forums, 605 individuals were identified as being either an adolescent with AIS (n = 305) or a parent of a child with AIS (n = 300). All posts from these two populations were downloaded and each participant’s posts were numbered. One post from each participant was randomly selected using a random number generator. The dates of these posts ranged from November 2003 through to August 2014.

Instrumentation

Categories and subcategories were coded based on the preliminary analysis and establishment of inter-rater reliability. Each information exchange was coded as either providing information or seeking information. Research indicates that the amount and type of illness-related information that an individual seeks is influenced by stage of illness, treatment experience, and consequences of the illness and treatment [12]. Therefore, if mentioned in the post, participants were coded as being recently diagnosed and having undergone (consequences) or currently undergoing common AIS stages of treatment progression (observation, brace, surgery) [13].

The type of information exchanged was coded into three major categories (AIS-specific, brace-specific, and other biomedical information). The AIS-specific subcategories included the following: causes/diagnosis/progression, co-morbid conditions/pain, functioning, and appearance/deformity. Brace-specific information included the following subcategories: how many hours per day of brace wear (recommended or actual), how long in months or years having undergone or undergoing brace treatment, types of braces, brace non-adherence (mentions of not wearing brace per recommendation), brace effectiveness, physical appearance, brace comfort, daily functioning, exercise/sports, and clothes/dressing. Finally other biomedical information subcategories captured information regarding: doctors/hospitals, and research/resources.

The first author and a graduate student read through randomly selected posts from the two OSGs and recorded the presence of information exchanged regarding the categories and subcategories. The two coders met to discuss discrepancies, review decision rules, and combine variable subcategories (if necessary), until acceptable reliabilities were achieved. Acceptable reliability was based on Krippendorff’s alpha scores that were greater than 0.80 [14]. After reliabilities were achieved, the two coders independently analyzed 15 % (n = 90) of the sample. The inter-coder reliability coefficients for the major information subcategories ranged from 0.87 to 0.97.

Statistical analysis

The coding instrument data collection tool was developed using the REDCap data collection software. After the randomly selected posts had been coded, the data was exported and the statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 21 and SAS Enterprise Guide 4.3. Pearson’s Chi-Square was conducted for comparisons between and within the adolescent and parent participants.

Results

Table 1 describes adolescent and parent characteristics, including stage of illness/treatment, and types of AIS-related, brace-related, and other biomedical information exchanged. As far as stage of illness/treatment there were significantly more parents (p < 0.001) participating in the OSGs that had a child that was recently diagnosed with scoliosis compared to adolescents that were recently diagnosed. There were significantly more adolescents participating in the OSGs that had undergone or were currently undergoing brace treatment (p = 0.004) compared to parents of a child in this group. Compared to adolescents, parents were exchanging significantly more information regarding doctors/hospitals (p = < 0.001).
Table 1

Characteristics of Adolescents with AIS and Parents of a Child with AIS in OSGs

 

Adolescents (n = 305)

Parents (n = 300)

p

Gender

  

.770

 Female

205 (89 %)

208 (92 %)

 

 Male

25 (11 %)

18 (8 %)

 

Current/past treatments

 Just diagnosed

28 (9 %)

90 (20 %)

< .001

 Observation

23 (8 %)

27 (9 %)

.515

 Brace treatment

196 (64 %)

158 (53 %)

.004

 Scheduled for surgery

14 (5 %)

17 (6 %)

.549

 Have had surgery

31 (10 %)

21 (7 %)

.165

Type of information exchange

  

.180

 Providing information

160 (52 %)

141 (47 %)

 

 Seeking information

145 (48 %)

159 (53 %)

 

AIS-specific information

 Causes, progression and/or diagnosis

96 (31 %)

145 (48 %)

< .001

 Co-occurring conditions and/or pain

45 (15 %)

42 (14 %)

.792

 Physical functioning

25 (8 %)

20 (20 %)

.474

 Appearance

38 (12 %)

16 (5 %)

.002

Brace-specific information

 Daily/nightly brace wear

40 (13 %)

35 (12 %)

.589

 Monthly/yearly brace wear

35 (11 %)

24 (8 %)

.150

 Types of brace

62 (20 %)

75 (25 %)

.170

 Non-adherence to brace wear

20 (7 %)

13 (4 %)

.230

 Effectiveness of brace treatment

52 (17 %)

63 (21 %)

.216

 Physical appearance in front of others

58 (19 %)

26 (9 %)

< .001

 Comfortableness of wearing the brace

57 (19 %)

47 (16 %)

.325

 Daily physical functioning in brace

31 (8 %)

27 (9 %)

.725

 Participation in sports/exercise

7 (2 %)

17 (6 %)

.034

 What to wear/clothes and/or how to dress

33 (11 %)

27 (9 %)

.455

Other biomedical information

 Doctors/hospitals

14 (5 %)

63 (21 %)

< .001

 Research/resources

11 (4 %)

16 (5 %)

.305

Note. p-value is two-sided, significance at 0.05

Table 2 displays most to least frequent of the four AIS-specific and the ten brace-specific information subcategories. Despite information about AIS-related causes, progression, and/or diagnosis being the most frequent information exchange for both adolescents (n = 96) and parents (n = 145), there were significantly more parents (p < 0.001) exchanging (providing and seeking) this information compared to adolescents. Brace-related concerns about appearance was the third most frequent information exchange by adolescents (n = 58), which was significantly more (p < 0.001) than ninth ranking for parents (n = 26). Concerns about AIS-specific deformities and appearance ranked eighth for adolescents (n = 38) and was mentioned significantly more (p = 0.002) compared to the thirteenth ranked subcategory for parents of a child with AIS (n = 13). Finally, while information regarding brace-specific concerns about participation in sports ranked low in frequency in both age groups, parents (n = 17) had moderately significantly more mentions (p = 0.034) compared to adolescents (n = 7).
Table 2

Adolescents’ and Parents’ AIS-specific and Brace-Specific Information Exchanges by Most to Least Frequently Mentioned Subcategories

Note. p-value is two-sided, significance at 0.05

When comparing message exchanges that were providing information to messages that were seeking information, there were several significant differences within each age group based on stage of diagnosis/treatment, and based on the three information categories (AIS-related, brace-related, and other biomedical). Table 3 summarizes the frequencies and differences in the adolescent and parent groups based on whether the individual was providing information or seeking information. Adolescents were seeking significantly more information than providing it when they were just diagnosed (p = 0.021) and were undergoing observation (p = 0.002). Parents of a child that had been recently diagnosed with AIS were also seeking information significantly more than they were providing information (p < 0.001). Adolescents that experienced brace treatment were providing significantly more information compared to seeking (p = 0.008). Both adolescents and parents of a child were providing information significantly more than they were seeking information when they were scheduled to have surgery (p = 0.011 and p = 0.012, respectively) and when they had already had surgery (both groups, p < 0.001).
Table 3

Characteristics of Adolescents and Parents Information Exchanges (Seeking or Providing) in OSGs

 

Adolescents

Parents

Providing information (n = 160)

Seeking information (n = 145)

p

Providing information (n = 141)

Seeking information (n = 159)

p

Past/current treatment

 Just diagnosed

9

19

.021

8

53

< .001

 Observation

5

18

.002

10

17

.278

 Brace

114

82

.008

82

76

.073

 Having surgery

12

2

.011

13

4

.012

 Had surgery

28

3

< .001

19

2

< .001

AIS-specific

 Causes

41

55

.021

59

86

.034

 Co-occurring

16

29

.014

9

33

< .001

 Functioning

7

18

.011

9

11

.085

 Appearance

10

28

.001

12

4

.070

Brace-specific

 Daily/nightly

27

13

.041

19

16

.359

 Monthly/yearly

24

11

.043

14

10

.247

 Types of

39

23

.065

40

35

.205

 Non-adherence

12

8

.486

5

8

.529

 Effectiveness

39

13

< .001

32

31

.498

 Appearance

36

22

.104

21

5

< .001

 Comfort

29

28

.791

28

19

.060

 Functioning

16

15

.921

11

16

.495

 Exercise/sports

4

3

.802

7

10

.621

 Clothes/dress

20

13

.322

16

11

.182

Other biomedical

 Doctors/hospitals

7

7

.851

23

40

.061

 Research/resources

9

2

.047

13

3

.005

Note. p-value is two-sided, significance at 0.05

Adolescents were seeking significantly more than providing AIS-specific information regarding causes/progression/diagnosis (p = 0.021), co-morbid conditions/pain (p = 0.014), daily physical functioning (p = 0.011), and appearance/deformity concerns (p < 0.001). Adolescents were providing significantly more than seeking brace-specific information regarding daily/nightly brace wear (p = 0.041), monthly/yearly brace wear (p = 0.043), and effectiveness of brace treatment (p < 0.001). Parents were seeking information significantly more compared to providing regarding AIS causes/progression/diagnosis (p = 0.034) and co-morbid conditions/pain (p < 0.001). Finally, parents were providing information significantly more than seeking information concerning appearance in the brace (p < 0.001).

Discussion

Results from this study indicate that there are similarities regarding the reasons adolescents with AIS and parents of a child with AIS are participating in the AIS-related OSGs. The most sought after information by both adolescents and parents was regarding the causes, progression and/or diagnosis of AIS. Two of the top four most frequent types of information exchanged for both adolescents and parents were regarding types of brace and brace comfort. These findings suggest that, regardless of stage of diagnosis/treatment, adolescents and parents might not be receiving enough information from healthcare providers and are therefore going to the OSGs to exchange (provide and seek) information about other’s experiences with the causes, progression and/or diagnosis of AIS and about other’s experiences with particular types of braces, in particular the comfort of different braces.

Results from this study also found differences between adolescents and parents participating in the AIS-related OSGs regarding their stage of diagnosis/treatment and regarding the type of AIS-related and brace-related information being exchanged. In general, it appears that parents immediately go online as soon as a child is diagnosed with AIS to seek information regarding the causes of AIS and health conditions associated with AIS. While adolescents wait until they have experienced brace treatment to participate in OSGs for the purpose of seeking information regarding AIS-related causes/diagnosis/progression and for providing information regarding their experiences, in particular how much they wore the brace (per day and years) and whether brace treatment was effective. These findings suggest that, compared to the other, adolescents and parents of a child with AIS might need additional AIS-related information based on their stage of diagnosis and treatment. For example, compared to adolescents, at the onset of AIS diagnosis parents might benefit from additional information from healthcare providers regarding AIS-related information regarding causes/diagnosis/progression, and co-occurring conditions/pain. While adolescents that have undergone or are currently undergoing brace treatment might benefit from additional information from healthcare providers regarding any AIS-related information, in particular causes/diagnosis/progression.

Findings from this study also suggest that adolescents might benefit from additional support and coping strategies regarding other adolescent and parent experiences with AIS-related appearance/deformity concerns, brace wear appearance-related concerns, and regarding relationships between brace wear and brace effectiveness. According to Brashers et al. [13], this type of information and social support can assist in the following ways: facilitate skills development (i.e. giving tips regarding how they changed for PE class with the brace on); giving or receiving acceptance or validation (i.e. validating others frustration regarding brace wear); and encouraging perspective shifts (i.e. telling others that they too were frustrated but wearing the brace was just a short-time in one’s life).

In an attempt to provide families affected by AIS with additional information and support that they may be unable to address in the healthcare setting, some healthcare providers are referring families to AIS-related websites [15]. While the internet can be a helpful tool for empowering families dealing with AIS, current research indicates that the quality of scoliosis-specific information regarding AIS and treatments is poor, irrelevant, and misleading [1618]. Findings from this study may provide insight into whether individuals participating in OSGs are negatively or positively biasing information compared to the experiences of individuals that are not participating in the OSGs and compared to AIS-related research findings. For example, adolescents that didn’t wear their brace and didn’t need surgery might be unintentionally providing support that encourages others to not wear their brace as recommended. On the flip side, adolescents that wore their brace as recommended but still needed to have surgery might be participating in the OSGs to vent their frustration, which may have encouraged others to not adhere to brace wear recommendations.

In summary, healthcare providers need to be aware of how families dealing with AIS are exchanging health information on the internet including: type of format (such as OSGs), who is participating (adolescents and parents), when they are participating (stage of diagnosis/treatment), and the type of and accuracy of information that is being provided. This type of knowledge may help the healthcare provider address any confusion that information from the internet may be generating, in particular information from other adolescents in OSGs regarding their brace-wear experience and whether it was effective. While highlighting the fact that everyone’s experience is different, healthcare providers can refer families dealing with AIS to additional quality internet resources for social support and for evidence-based information, such as recent results from the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

BrAIST research findings indicate that bracing significantly decreased the progression of high-risk curves to the threshold of needing surgery (>50° largest Cobb angle) in adolescents with AIS [19]. In addition, BrAIST findings indicate that physical appearance and quality-of-life are not negatively impacted by nor does it negatively impact, brace wear compared to individuals undergoing observation or brace wear adherence [20, 21]. BrAIST results, along with the nature and complexity of the condition of AIS and its treatment, can be communicated to families dealing with AIS to help address some of the information, questions, and possibly misinformation that are being generated in AIS-related OSGs.

Because AIS is a less-common condition, for some adolescents and parents, the internet is the only place they may connect with other individuals who have similar experiences and obtain information regarding AIS that is relevant to their lives. Findings from this study highlight the potential for providing web-based support to address the types of information needs and support of families dealing with AIS. Furthermore, findings from this study suggest that the web-based support needs to include information that is tailored to adolescents and parents, to age group and to stages of diagnosis/illness, and provide accurate, evidenced-based information. Ultimately, this type of information and social supportive intervention may improve health communication within and outside of the healthcare setting.

Conclusion

This study is the first to examine types of health information exchanged in OSGs by adolescents with AIS and parents of a child with AIS. Results from this study suggest that adolescents and parents are seeking and providing information regarding the condition of AIS, AIS-treatment, and other biomedical information in OSGs. This study found differences between adolescents and parents in the stages of diagnosis/treatment and in the type of information being exchanged in AIS-related OSGs, including whether individuals are providing or seeking certain types of information. Therefore, information that is being provided to adolescents with AIS and parents of a child with AIS should take into consideration the age of the individual and the stage of diagnosis/treatments. This study of adolescents’ and parents’ information exchange in AIS-related OSGs may help inform priorities in health communication among healthcare providers and adolescents with AIS and parents of a child with AIS, and between adolescents and parents that are dealing with AIS.

Abbreviations

AIS, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; IRB, institutional review board; NSF, National Scoliosis Foundation; OSG, online support groups

Declarations

Acknowledgements

A sincere thank you to Ellen Schafer for assisting with coding for the purpose of establishing inter-rater reliability. This project was supported by The University of Iowa RedCap Grant U54TR001013.

Authors’ contributions

SC and SA contributed in the analysis, interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. KF and SW contributed in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The author’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), the University of Iowa IRB, determined this study to be non-Human Subjects Research.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa
(2)
Department of Community and Behavioral Health, The University of Iowa
(3)
Department of Communication Studies, The College of New Jersey
(4)
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa

References

  1. Iconomou G, Vagenakis AG, Kaolfonos HP. The informational needs, satisfaction with communication, and psychological status of primary caregivers of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2001;9:591–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Isaksen AS, Thuen F, Hanestad B. Patients with cancer and their close relatives: experiences with treatment, care, and support. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26:68–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nordfeldt S, Ängarne-Lindberg T, Nordwall M, Krevers B. Parents of Adolescents with type 1 diabetes--their views on information and communication needs and internet use. A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062096.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Sapountzi-Krepia DS, Psychogiou M, Peterson D, Zafiri V, Iordanopoulou E, Michailidou F, Christodoulou A. The experience of brace treatment in children/adolescents with scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2006;I:8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1748_7161.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sapountzi-Krepia DS, Valavanis J, Panteleakis GP, Zangana DT, Vlachojiannis PC, Sapkas GS. Perception of body image, happiness and satisfaction in adolescents wearing a Boston brace for scoliosis treatment. Issues Innov Nurs Pract. 2001;35:683–90.Google Scholar
  6. Davison KP, Pennebaker JW, Dickerson AS. Who talks? The social psychology of illness in support groups. Am Psychol. 2000;55:205–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:405–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:61–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Villhauer RP. Perceived benefits of online support groups for women with metastatic breast cancer. Women Health. 2009;49:381–404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Oprescu F, Campo S, Lowe J, Andsager J, Morcuende JA. Online information exchanges for parents of children with a rare health condition: key findings from an online support community. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Scharer K. Internet social support for parents: the state of science. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2005;18:26–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, Horne R. The illness perception questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Psychol Health. 1996;11:431–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Brashers DE, Neidig JL, Goldsmith DJ. Social support and the management of uncertainty for people living with HIV or AIDS. Health Commun. 2004;16:305–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Bettany-Saltikov J, Martin D, Wellburn S, et al. Information provided to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at the first point of diagnosis in the hospital clinic: a survey of UK NHS scoliosis consultants. Scoliosis. 2012;7 Suppl 1:036.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Nason GJ, Baker JF, Byrne DP, et al. Scoliosis-specific information on the internet: has the “information highway” led to better information provision. Spine. 2012;37:E1363–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, et al. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the internet. Spine. 2005;30:2695–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wellburn S, Bettany-Saltikov J, van Schaik P. An evaluation of web sites recommended by UK NHS consultant to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at the first point of diagnosis. Spine. 2013;38(18):1590–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1512–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwieger T, Campo S, Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Ashida S, Steuber KR. Body image and quality-of-life in untreated versus brace-treated females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2016;41(4):311–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwieger T, Campo S, Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Ashida S, Steuber KR: Body image, quality-of-life and brace wear adherence in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2016. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement